Original Research by School Decision on Belcourt 7
Belcourt Public School District #7 sits in northern North Dakota and serves students from prekindergarten through twelfth grade. The district operates four open schools: Turtle Mountain Community Elementary School, Turtle Mountain Community Middle School, Turtle Mountain Community High School, and Tiny Turtles Preschool. Three virtual schools the district had operated at the elementary, middle, and high school levels are now closed. The enrollment is mid-sized for a rural district serving a single community, and the student body is overwhelmingly American Indian or Alaska Native, with only a handful of students from other racial or ethnic backgrounds. This is a district rooted in the Turtle Mountain community, and that identity shapes everything about how it functions.
State assessment results from the current year are available under North Dakota's A-PLUS assessment, but the state changed both the assessment name and the proficiency cut scores this year, so the data is not comparable to prior years and no trend information can be drawn from it. What the current results show is a district where proficiency in both math and English language arts sits at low levels across most elementary and middle school grades. The earliest grades tend to show the lowest proficiency, with a modest uptick in the upper elementary years. In math, proficiency dips again in the middle grades before rising in eighth grade to the district's strongest math result. English language arts follows a similar arc, with seventh and eighth grade landing higher than the elementary grades. Science, tested in fourth and eighth grade, shows eighth grade as the relative bright spot, with nearly half of tested students reaching proficiency.
Participation rates are solid across grades and subjects, generally at or near full participation, which means the results reflect the broader student body rather than a skewed subset. A parent reading these results should understand that a new assessment with new cut scores makes it hard to judge whether this year is typical or an anomaly. The proficiency levels are low in absolute terms, and a parent may want to look into this further with the district, asking what improvement plans are in place and how the transition to the new assessment affected results.
Beyond test scores, the data is thin. Free and reduced-price lunch information was not reported, so the economic profile of the student body is not available here. Special education and English learner counts are also missing. No graduation rate was provided, which limits the picture of how students fare through high school completion. No staffing, course access, or discipline data was included, so questions about class sizes, advanced coursework, career pathways, and school climate cannot be answered from the available data. Housing values and rents were not provided, so there is no economic context for families considering a move into the area. A community and locale brief was not available, which means the narrative cannot describe the surrounding town, its growth or decline, or its housing market.
The district brief searched publicly available sources for recent changes such as referendums, curriculum shifts, pedagogy changes, or property-tax adjustments, and found nothing that would have lasting impact on families. This does not mean nothing is happening, only that nothing surfaced in the sources checked.
What a parent is left with is a district with a strong, distinct cultural identity, a full prekindergarten-through-twelfth-grade pathway, and assessment results that indicate real academic challenges, particularly in the early grades. The absence of graduation data, program listings, staffing details, and community context means families would need to go directly to the district for a fuller picture. The questions worth asking are direct ones: what supports are in place for students who are not yet proficient, what the high school experience looks like in terms of course offerings and post-graduation pathways, and how the district is responding to the transition in state assessments. The district's identity and community grounding are clear. Its academic standing, as captured in this year's data, points to a place where families should engage closely with school leadership before forming a judgment.
See more original research from School Decision →