Original Research by School Decision on Medina 3
Medina Public School District 3 sits in rural North Dakota and serves students from pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade across two schools, Medina Elementary and Medina High. The enrollment is small, with each grade level carrying only a handful of students. That small scale is a defining feature of the place: children grow up alongside the same classmates year after year, and families tend to know one another. The student body is almost entirely white, with only a few students identifying as multiracial, Asian, or Hispanic. This is a homogeneous, close-knit rural community.
The district's state assessment results come from North Dakota's A-PLUS test, administered for the first time in the most recent school year. Because the assessment name and proficiency cut scores both changed, year-over-year trend comparisons are not reliable. A parent looking at these results should treat them as a fresh baseline rather than a continuation of prior years' data. The state reported proficiency as ranges rather than exact figures, which is common for districts with very small grade-level cohorts where precise numbers could identify individual students.
In mathematics, the picture is uneven. Third grade stands out as a genuine bright spot, with proficiency landing in a high range that suggests strong early-grade instruction. Fourth grade, by contrast, falls to the bottom of the scale. Fifth and sixth grades recover to a moderate range, while seventh and eighth grade results span a wide band that includes both weaker and more middling outcomes. The inconsistency from grade to grade is the dominant pattern, and in a district this small, even a couple of students moving in or out can shift a grade-level result substantially.
Reading results, reported under English language arts, tell a similar story of mixed performance. Third grade sits in a moderate range. Fourth grade again drops to the lower end. Grades five through eight all land in a band that runs from the lower end to roughly the middle of the state scale, with none of these upper-elementary or middle-school grades reaching what would be considered a strong proficiency level. The district's middle-grade reading outcomes are a soft spot a parent may want to look into further with the school, particularly if a child is entering those grades.
Science was tested in fourth and eighth grade. Both grade levels show proficiency in a lower-to-middling range. The tested grades and subjects are limited, so the science picture is thin.
Participation rates in state testing were generally solid, with most grades at or near full participation and one grade slightly lower.
Several data categories the state or federal government normally reports are missing here. Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility was not available, so the economic profile of the student body cannot be characterized from the data. Special-education and English-learner rates were also absent. No graduation rate was provided, though the district does serve high school grades through twelfth. No civil-rights data on discipline, course access, or staffing was available. Housing values and rental costs for the community were not in the data, and no locale brief was provided for the town or area. We searched for recent district-level changes such as curriculum updates, property-tax shifts, or bond referendums and found none publicly reported in the span we reviewed, so those topics are left out rather than guessed at.
What the data does show is a small, rural, single-community district where academic results vary widely by grade and subject. The early grades produce some genuinely strong math outcomes. The middle grades in reading and several grades in math sit lower. Because the district is so small, each grade's results reflect only a few children, and a parent reading these results would do well to ask the school how instruction is sequenced across grade bands and what supports are in place where proficiency dips. The lack of economic, special-population, and graduation data leaves a real gap in understanding the full student experience, and those are reasonable questions to raise directly with district staff.
See more original research from School Decision →