Original Research by School Decision on Mcclusky-goodrich 29
McClusky-Goodrich 29 is a very small rural district in Sheridan County, North Dakota, serving students from pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade across two schools, one elementary and one high school. The enrollment is tiny even by rural standards, with only a handful of students in most grades. The student body is overwhelmingly white, with a few students identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black, or two or more races. The district did not report free-or-reduced-price lunch counts, special education rates, or English learner figures, so the economic and special-population picture here is incomplete. A parent looking for those details would need to ask the district directly.
State assessment results are available for the current year but come as ranges rather than single point estimates, which is typical when very few students are tested in a given grade. North Dakota also changed its assessment name and proficiency cut scores this year, so the results are not directly comparable to prior years. What the data shows is a mixed but generally encouraging picture. Third-grade math proficiency landed in a moderate-to-strong range, and sixth-grade math was very strong, with nearly all tested students reaching proficiency. Seventh-grade math was weaker, with proficiency in a lower range. In English language arts, third grade showed mixed results, while sixth grade was again very strong. Participation rates were consistent across the reported grades. The wide range at some grade levels reflects the reality of testing very small cohorts, where one or two students can move the proportion substantially. Parents should treat these results as a general signal rather than a precise measure, and the assessment change means trend watching will need to wait for another year or two of comparable data.
No graduation rate was reported for this district. For a district this small, graduation cohorts can be tiny, and state reporting sometimes suppresses or omits figures for privacy or statistical reliability. This does not necessarily indicate a problem, but a parent with a high school student would want to ask the district directly about completion and post-graduation outcomes.
The housing market in the area is very affordable compared with both state and national benchmarks. Typical home values sit well below the North Dakota statewide figure and far below the national figure. The area has seen a modest recent decline in values, driven mainly by one of the two contributing zip codes. Rent data was not available. For families already earning a reasonable income, housing costs here are likely to represent a small burden relative to earnings.
The district brief searched for recent parent-relevant changes such as referendums, curriculum shifts, or property tax adjustments and found nothing beyond basic directory and enrollment information. This is a quiet district with no publicly reported disruptions or initiatives in the recent record. Program offerings, staffing details, attendance data, course access information, and civil rights data were all absent from what was provided, so a parent would need to contact the schools directly to understand what electives, extracurriculars, support services, or advanced coursework options exist. Given the size, a parent should expect a close-knit environment where students are known individually but where program breadth is naturally limited by scale.
This district fits families looking for a small, rural, community-rooted setting where housing is inexpensive and class sizes are small. The academic results that are available are decent in the tested grades, though the data is thin and varies by cohort. What is missing is substantial, and the best next step for any interested parent is a direct conversation with the district about what the schools offer and how they support students across the full grade range.
See more original research from School Decision →