The top reported proficiency rate is 55% in English language arts. The lowest is 46% in Math.
Original Research by School Decision on Freeman School District 33-1
Freeman School District 33-1 is a small kindergarten-through-twelfth-grade district in Hutchinson County, South Dakota, serving a rural stretch of communities that includes Freeman, Marion, Parker, Hurley, and Parkston. The district operates five schools: Freeman Elementary, Freeman Junior High, Freeman High School, and two colony elementary schools, Tschetter Colony and Wolf Creek Colony. The presence of those colony schools points to a Hutterite community within the district's boundaries, a feature of many rural South Dakota districts where colony students attend small, localized elementary programs before their formal schooling typically concludes. This shapes the district's enrollment profile in ways a family should understand, since the colony schools serve a distinct population with different educational expectations than the mainstream Freeman campuses.
The district's total enrollment is small, as one would expect for a rural district covering several towns and surrounding farmland. The student body is predominantly white, with a modest Hispanic presence and very small numbers from other racial or ethnic groups. Data on free and reduced-price lunch eligibility was not available, so it is not possible to characterize the district's economic demographics from the provided information. Similarly, data on English learners and special education enrollment was missing, so those dimensions of the student population are not described here.
On state assessments, Freeman's results tell a mixed but largely middling story. In English language arts, roughly half of tested students in grades three through eight reached proficiency, which is a solid if unspectacular result for a district of this size and setting. Math proficiency ran somewhat lower, with less than half of tested students clearing the proficient bar. Science results, drawn from a smaller testing pool, landed right at the midpoint. Full participation was reported across all three subjects, which means these results reflect the entire tested population rather than a partial sample. Average scale scores were not available, so the proficiency rates are the primary window into academic performance. No multi-year trend data was provided, so it is unclear whether these results represent improvement, decline, or stability. A parent evaluating the district's academic standing would want to ask the schools directly about year-over-year patterns and how the district supports students who fall below proficiency, particularly in math.
The district's high school graduation rate was not included in the available data. For a district this small, graduation cohorts are tiny, and the absence may reflect reporting thresholds or a data gap rather than anything about the program itself. Course access, program offerings, staffing ratios, and discipline data were also not provided, so there is no basis here to describe advanced coursework, career pathways, extracurricular breadth, or school climate. A family considering Freeman High School should ask the district directly about what courses and programs are available, especially at the secondary level where a small school's offerings can vary widely depending on staffing and resources.
Housing in the district's zip codes is modestly priced relative to state and national benchmarks. The weighted typical home value sits well below the South Dakota statewide figure and further below the national benchmark. Within the district, values vary from town to town, with Freeman itself representing the largest share of the housing stock. Recent year-over-year appreciation in the Freeman zip code was strong, while some surrounding communities saw slight declines, suggesting that the housing market is not uniform across the district's territory. The price-to-income ratio sits in a range that is generally considered affordable by national standards, though current mortgage rates add to monthly carrying costs. Rental data was not available.
The district brief search turned up no parent-relevant changes or strategic initiatives. No locale brief was provided for the individual communities, so this account does not include details about local amenities, employment patterns, or community life beyond what the housing and economic data suggest. The unemployment rate at the national level has been stable, and median household income figures come from national series rather than district-specific data.
What the picture amounts to is a small, rural, predominantly white district with a mainstream campus in Freeman and two colony schools serving a distinct religious-community population. State test results are middling, with ELA the relative bright spot and math the softer area. Housing is affordable by broader standards. The gaps in the available data, including graduation rates, program offerings, and economic demographics, mean that a family evaluating this district would need to go directly to the schools for a fuller sense of what the secondary program looks like, what supports exist for struggling students, and how the colony and mainstream campuses relate to one another operationally.
See more original research from School Decision →