The top reported proficiency rate is 56% in Math. The lowest is 39% in Science.
Original Research by School Decision on Haakon School District 27-1
Haakon School District 27-1 is a small, single-community district in rural South Dakota, serving students from kindergarten through twelfth grade across four schools. The schools cluster around the town of Philip, with Philip Elementary, Philip Jr. High, and Philip High School, plus a second elementary campus in Milesville. The enrollment is modest, with each grade level carrying a handful of students, which means children here grow up in a setting where classmates are largely the same faces year after year. The student body is overwhelmingly white, with only a small number of students from other racial or ethnic backgrounds. That homogeneity is a characteristic of much of rural western South Dakota and reflects the community the district draws from rather than any policy choice.
Academically, the most recent state assessment results tell a mixed but generally solid story for a district of this size. In math, tested students in grades three through eight performed above the midpoint, with a clear majority reaching proficiency. English language arts results were more evenly split, with about half of tested students meeting the proficiency bar. Science results were weaker, with fewer than half of the tested students reaching proficiency. The science assessment covers a smaller group of tested grade levels, which is typical, but the gap between science and the other two subjects is wide enough that a parent may want to look into this further with the school to understand how science instruction is sequenced across the grade bands. Participation was full across all three subjects, which means the results reflect the whole tested population rather than a subset.
What the data does not cover is substantial. There is no free or reduced-price lunch information, no special education or English learner counts, and no staffing, attendance, or course-access data in the records we received. A parent evaluating student support services will need to go directly to the district for those details. The district does not report a graduation rate in this dataset, and while that gap often reflects how a small district's high school data is reported or absorbed into state-level reporting, we cannot confirm the reason here. Housing values, rents, and broader community economic context were also not available, so we cannot speak to what living in the district costs or how the housing market around Philip and Milesville behaves.
The district brief turned up little in the way of recent parent-relevant changes or publicly reported initiatives. We searched for strategic priorities, facility projects, or program shifts and found nothing of lasting impact documented in the available sources, so we left that space empty rather than guess.
For a family considering Haakon, the core question is whether a small, rural, tightly knit district fits what they want for their child. The class sizes are small, the peer group is stable, and the state testing results in math and reading suggest the district is doing reasonable work with its elementary and middle-grade students. Science is the area that stands out as softer. The absence of data on student support services, graduation outcomes, and community economics limits how fully anyone outside the district can assess it, so direct contact with the schools in Philip and Milesville would be the natural next step for a parent weighing enrollment here.
See more original research from School Decision →