The top reported proficiency rate is 34% in Math. The lowest is 29% in English language arts.
Original Research by School Decision on Eisenhower Center for Innovation
Eisenhower Center for Innovation is a regular public school in Mesa, Arizona, serving students from prekindergarten through sixth grade. Part of the Mesa Unified District, it sits in the older western section of the city, a densely developed part of Mesa with a mix of single-family homes, strip commercial corridors, and light industrial areas. The school’s name suggests a focus on innovation, though the available data do not include details about any specific programs or curricula that differentiate it from a traditional elementary school. A parent interested in a particular pedagogical approach or enrichment offering would need to ask the school directly.
The student body is predominantly Hispanic, with smaller shares of Black students, White students, and modest numbers of Native American, multiracial, and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander students. Information on the share of students who qualify for free or reduced-price meals was not reported in the data made available, and neither were counts of students receiving special education services or classified as English learners. These are common data points that families use to understand the level of support and diversity of need in a school, and their absence here means a prospective parent should inquire at the school office.
State assessment results are available for the 2024-25 school year, but the picture is incomplete. Proficiency rates in English language arts and math were reported for third and fourth graders, while results for fifth and sixth graders in math were suppressed, as were fifth-grade science scores. Where data are reported, the rates are modest. In third grade, about one in five students met the state’s proficiency bar in both reading and math. By fourth grade, the reading rate rose to roughly three in ten and the math rate to about four in ten. Across all tested grades and subjects, the school’s composite proficiency measure places it below the midpoint among districts in Maricopa County. That comparison is not to individual elementary schools but to entire districts, so it gives a broad sense that academic performance here trails the typical district-level outcome in the county. A family considering this school should discuss with staff how the school supports students who are not yet at grade level and what interventions are in place.
Because Eisenhower serves only elementary grades, it has no graduation rate, and data on chronic absenteeism were not available. No details on staffing ratios, disciplinary incidents, or course access were provided either. The Mesa Unified District itself did not have publicly reported recent major changes or initiatives that a parent would need to track, at least from the sources searched.
The housing context around the school reflects the broader Mesa market. Mesa is a large, sprawling suburban city, auto-oriented in its daily life, with a modest downtown core that offers some walkable blocks, a light rail connection to Tempe and Phoenix, and a few cultural anchors such as the Mesa Arts Center. Major employers include Boeing, Banner Health, and the district itself. The area has seen sustained growth, with new development pushing eastward, but the part of Mesa where Eisenhower sits is older and more established. Home values in the school’s ZIP code are somewhat below the state average, and rents take up a manageable portion of typical household income, making this a relatively accessible entry point for families.
Overall, Eisenhower Center for Innovation is a neighborhood elementary school in a large and diverse district, serving a predominantly Hispanic student body in an older part of Mesa. Academic proficiency in the tested grades is below the midpoint of Maricopa County districts, and a parent would want to learn more about the school’s academic support systems, its programs for students who are behind, and the resources available for English learners and students with disabilities, since those details are not captured in the public data reviewed here.
See more original research from School Decision →