The top reported proficiency rate is 20% in English language arts. The lowest is 8% in Math.
Original Research by School Decision on Stanton County Jr./sr. High School
Stanton County Jr./Sr. High School serves grades seven through twelve in Johnson, Kansas, the county seat of Stanton County in the southwestern corner of the state. The school is part of the Stanton County district and is the only secondary school in this small, rural community. Johnson is a quiet Great Plains town with a modest commercial core, a downtown Main Street, and civic functions centered on the county courthouse. The area is primarily agricultural, and the town itself has a modest population with a significant Hispanic or Latino share of residents. Housing in the immediate area is notably more affordable than both the Kansas statewide and national medians, reflecting the rural character of the region.
The school enrollment is small, typical for a rural district covering the full junior high and high school span. A substantial share of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, placing the school in a context where many families face economic strain. The student body is majority Hispanic, with a substantial white cohort and small numbers of students identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black, or two or more races. Data on students with individualized education programs and English learner status was not available in the profile, so a parent may want to ask the school directly about the extent of special education and language support services.
State testing results for the 2024-25 school year are available for seventh and eighth grades in math and English language arts, and for eighth grade in science. Kansas changed its cut scores for math and English language arts tests in recent years, which means results from this year are not directly comparable to earlier years. The proficiency rates in the tested grades are low across all three subjects, with math showing particularly weak results. English language arts proficiency is somewhat higher but still below a level many families would consider strong. These figures suggest that a significant portion of students in the middle grades are not yet meeting state academic benchmarks. A parent considering this school may want to follow up with the administration about what academic interventions and supports are in place for these grade levels and whether the school has seen any trend line in the years that are comparable.
Because the school serves only grades seven through twelve, it does not administer the state assessments for the full high school grade span, so the testing picture is incomplete. The profile did not include a four-year graduation rate, chronic absenteeism data, or course access information such as Advanced Placement or dual-credit offerings. It is common for a small rural school of this size to have limited advanced course menus, but the data provided does not confirm or deny that. The same gap applies to discipline data and staffing ratios. The district brief turned up little of lasting impact in terms of recent changes or initiatives, suggesting a period of relative stability.
The comparison set for this school is not useful here. Because Stanton County has only one public school district, there are no other districts in the county against which to compare this school’s proficiency or graduation metrics. The school stands alone in its county context. That means a parent cannot look at local peers to gauge relative performance; the comparison would need to be against other small rural schools across Kansas or against the state averages, but those data are not presented here.
For a family rooted in this community, Stanton County Jr./Sr. High is the only public secondary option in the area. The school offers the intimacy of a small learning environment, but the academic results on state tests raise real questions about whether students are being prepared at grade level in the middle years. A family moving into the area or weighing their options would want to have a direct conversation with the principal about academic programming, support for struggling students, and what pathways exist for college or career preparation at the high school level, since the profile does not document those offerings. The community itself is stable, affordable, and quiet, with a small-town feel and limited commercial or cultural amenities. The fit is likeliest for families who are already part of this rural area or who are comfortable with a very small school and the need to be proactive about understanding the academic supports their child will receive.
See more original research from School Decision →