The top reported proficiency rate is 39% in English language arts. The lowest is 18% in Science.
Original Research by School Decision on Fisher Secondary
Fisher Secondary serves students in grades seven through twelve in the small rural community of Fisher, Minnesota, a village situated between East Grand Forks and Crookston within the Greater Grand Forks metro area. The town functions as a bedroom community; a substantial share of residents commute to the Grand Forks area for work. Local employment is concentrated in manufacturing, educational services, and health care. The town is compact, car-dependent, and has limited housing stock. Its population has been stable to slightly declining in recent years, typical of small rural Minnesota towns that rely on a nearby metro for economic anchor. A major capital construction project undertaken by the Fisher Public School District in recent years, with significant spending relative to its size, suggests facility investments that may have improved the school environment.
The school itself is small, enrolling a student body that fits the rural character of the town. The student population is predominantly white, with a notable Hispanic minority and smaller shares of American Indian, Black, and multiracial students. About half of students qualify for free or reduced-price meals, reflecting the modest income profile of the community. Information on students with disabilities and English learners was not provided in the available data.
Academically, Fisher Secondary’s state assessment results are available for the grades that are tested, seventh and eighth, in math, reading, and science. Proficiency rates in math and reading were modest, and science proficiency was lower. On a school-level proficiency index that averages results across tested subjects and grades, Fisher Secondary placed in the bottom quartile relative to other districts in Polk County. No multi-year trend data were available, as only one year of results was reported, so it is not possible to assess whether performance is improving or declining. The school serves grades seven through twelve, but high school state assessment results were not included in the data, and the four-year graduation rate was also missing. A parent may want to ask the school directly about high school outcomes and postsecondary preparedness.
No information was provided about advanced coursework, career and technical education pathways, or dual-credit offerings, so the breadth of academic programming for older students is unclear. Similarly, data on discipline, chronic absenteeism, staffing ratios, and course access were absent. These gaps are common for a small school and do not necessarily indicate shortcomings, but families considering Fisher Secondary may wish to seek details from the school.
The housing market in Fisher is relatively affordable, with home values below state and national benchmarks, though supply is limited. The town’s stable-to-shrinking population means housing turnover is likely low, and new development is constrained by the village’s small area. For a family looking for a quiet, rural setting with a short commute to Grand Forks and a very small school where students are known, Fisher Secondary may be a good fit. The academic picture, based on the partial data available, suggests that families should inquire directly about high school outcomes and program offerings to ensure they align with their student’s goals.
See more original research from School Decision →