Gfw Elementary School, Gibbon MN

Original Research by School Decision on Gfw Elementary School

GFW Elementary School serves a small, rural community from Gibbon and the surrounding parts of Sibley County. It is a regular public school in the GFW Public Schools district, and it covers only pre-kindergarten through fourth grade. Because it ends at fourth grade, there is no graduation rate to report, and no high school outcomes to evaluate. A parent looking ahead should expect that their child will move on to a different school in the district for the upper elementary and secondary grades.

The school is small, and the student body is predominantly white, with a substantial Hispanic population making up about a fifth of the enrollment. A significant share of the students come from lower-income households, as reflected in the free and reduced-price lunch count. Data on students with disabilities and English learners was not available.

Academically, the school shows a mixed picture. In math, proficiency rates across the third, fourth, and fifth grades varied, with the strongest result in fourth grade. In reading and language arts, third-grade proficiency was well below the rest of the school, while fourth and fifth graders performed at a moderate level. Science results, available for fifth grade only, were lower. When compared to other districts in Sibley County, GFW Elementary’s overall proficiency across subjects sits in the top quartile, meaning it performs above the midpoint of its county peers. That context matters, because this is a small county with a handful of districts, and the comparison set is a narrow one. A family looking strictly at state or national benchmarks would see a school where some grade-level groups are solid and others need support; a parent may want to ask the school directly how they address the gaps in early reading and science.

The town of Gibbon is a quiet, shrinking rural community with deep German and Scandinavian roots and a modest housing stock that is considerably more affordable than the Minnesota average. Home values have risen in recent years but remain low relative to the rest of the state. The school is woven into the town’s small fabric, near the village hall and the public library. There are no major private employers in town, so the school district itself is one of the main local anchors.

The parents who fit this school best are those who want a small, rural, pre-K–4 setting for their young children and are willing to plan ahead for the transition to the district’s later grades. A parent who values a close community and an affordable housing market will find that here. A parent who sees uneven proficiency numbers and wants assurance that early literacy struggles are being addressed should have that conversation directly with the school, because the publicly available data points to that as the area most in need of attention. The district itself did not have any recent major changes, like a referendum or curriculum overhaul, to report, which suggests a stable but not rapidly evolving setting.

See more original research from School Decision →

Academic performance

How students perform on state tests, by grade, set against the district.

Math

Grade 342%

School 42% · District 42%

▼ 13 pts below state median

Grade 462%

School 62% · District 62%

▲ 11 pts above state median

Grade 550%

School 50% · District 50%

▲ 15 pts above state median

English language arts

Grade 331%

School 31% · District 31%

▼ 11 pts below state median

Grade 455%

School 55% · District 55%

▲ 14 pts above state median

Grade 561%

School 61% · District 61%

▲ 7 pts above state median

Science

Grade 526%

School 26% · District 26%

▲ 2 pts above state median

This schoolGFW Public Schools, same grade

Graduation rate (ACGR) reflects the federally published Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate for the most recent year available. We refresh this data annually at the close of each academic year in June. The federal source publishes a banded rate (for example, "90-94%") instead of an exact number for cohorts small enough to risk identifying individual students. The state distribution chart, where shown, plots every school in the state with a published rate or band; schools whose rate is federally suppressed are excluded. Where the federal source publishes a band rather than an exact rate, the school is placed within its band using a stable, ID-derived offset, so its position is consistent across visits.

Proficiency by household income

English language arts

Grade 3Lower-income23%Higher-income43%20 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income46%Higher-income61%16 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income47%Higher-income71%24 pp gap

Mathematics

Grade 3Lower-income32%Higher-income57%25 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income46%Higher-income72%27 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income35%Higher-income62%27 pp gap