Missouri Virtual Academy, Hillsboro MO

Original Research by School Decision on Missouri Virtual Academy

Missouri Virtual Academy is a full-time virtual school serving kindergarten through 12th grade, operated by the Grandview R-II school district and based in Hillsboro, Missouri. It is a regular public school, not a charter or magnet, and it delivers all instruction online. For families considering a fully remote public school option, this is the fundamental starting point: the school’s entire model assumes that a student can learn effectively from home with consistent parent or guardian involvement and reliable internet access.

The school serves a large student population across every grade level, from kindergarten through high school. Its student body is racially and ethnically diverse—a majority white, with a notable share of black students and smaller numbers of Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and multiracial students. More than two in five students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, a signal that the school draws from a broad range of household incomes. Information on the percentage of students with disabilities or those learning English is not reported in the available data; a parent may want to ask the school directly about how it supports those populations in a virtual setting.

On state assessments, which measure proficiency in math, English language arts, and science across multiple grade levels, the school’s results are very low. In every tested grade and subject, the proportion of students reaching proficiency is far below typical levels. When compared with other districts in Jefferson County, the school’s overall proficiency index places it in the bottom quarter. These are meaningful numbers for any family evaluating academic outcomes. The school does not report a graduation rate, chronic absenteeism, or discipline data in the available records, so there is no way to gauge how many students complete high school or how consistently they attend. A parent considering this school will want to follow up on those missing measures.

The school is headquartered in Hillsboro, the county seat of Jefferson County, a growing rural community a short drive from St. Louis. Hillsboro has seen robust population growth over the past decade and describes itself as a progressive community expecting further expansion. Its historic courthouse remains the civic anchor, and several residential and lake developments are within easy reach. Housing values in the area sit above the state median, reflecting the mix of rural character and proximity to the metro region. The Grandview R-II district itself, as publicly reported, has not seen major recent changes such as property-tax shifts or curriculum overhauls that would affect family decisions.

Missouri Virtual Academy is a particular fit for families who have chosen virtual schooling for reasons of health, preference, or circumstance and who are comfortable with a model that shows weak academic proficiency results on state tests. The school’s low assessment outcomes are a clear soft spot, and the lack of graduation or attendance data leaves a significant gap in understanding student success. A parent weighing this school should seek out more information on how the school monitors academic progress, supports struggling students, and prepares high schoolers for graduation and postsecondary paths. The school’s location in a growing county with relatively high home values means nothing for a virtual student’s daily experience, but it anchors the school within a district that serves the broader area.

In sum, Missouri Virtual Academy offers a fully remote public school education for a large, diverse student body. Its state test scores are well below typical levels, and several key performance measures are absent from the record. The school may work well for families committed to online learning and aware of its academic challenges, but those challenges are real and worth investigating further.

See more original research from School Decision →

Academic performance

How students perform on state tests, by grade, set against the district.

Math

Grade 36%

School 6% · District 14% · ▼ 9 pts below district

▼ 34 pts below state median · ▼ 43 pts below county median

Grade 47%

School 7% · District 15% · ▼ 7 pts below district

▼ 36 pts below state median · ▼ 51 pts below county median

Grade 55%

School 5% · District 10% · ▼ 5 pts below district

▼ 30 pts below state median · ▼ 42 pts below county median

Grade 68%

School 8% · District 12% · ▼ 4 pts below district

▼ 35 pts below state median · ▼ 42 pts below county median

Grade 78%

School 8% · District 12% · ▼ 3 pts below district

▼ 34 pts below state median · ▼ 41 pts below county median

Grade 89%

School 9% · District 11% · ▼ 2 pts below district

▼ 18 pts below state median · ▼ 20 pts below county median

English language arts

Grade 314%

School 14% · District 20% · ▼ 6 pts below district

▼ 27 pts below state median · ▼ 34 pts below county median

Grade 413%

School 13% · District 21% · ▼ 8 pts below district

▼ 29 pts below state median · ▼ 36 pts below county median

Grade 517%

School 17% · District 23% · ▼ 6 pts below district

▼ 23 pts below state median · ▼ 29 pts below county median

Grade 618%

School 18% · District 19% · ▼ 1 pts below district

▼ 17 pts below state median · ▼ 24 pts below county median

Grade 720%

School 20% · District 22% · ▼ 2 pts below district

▼ 15 pts below state median · ▼ 24 pts below county median

Grade 813%

School 13% · District 15% · ▼ 2 pts below district

▼ 26 pts below state median · ▼ 34 pts below county median

Science

Grade 514%

School 14% · District 19% · ▼ 5 pts below district

▼ 27 pts below state median · ▼ 37 pts below county median

Grade 816%

School 16% · District 16% · ▼ 1 pts below district

▼ 19 pts below state median · ▼ 28 pts below county median

This schoolGRANDVIEW R-II, same grade

Graduation rate (ACGR) reflects the federally published Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate for the most recent year available. We refresh this data annually at the close of each academic year in June. The federal source publishes a banded rate (for example, "90-94%") instead of an exact number for cohorts small enough to risk identifying individual students. The state distribution chart, where shown, plots every school in the state with a published rate or band; schools whose rate is federally suppressed are excluded. Where the federal source publishes a band rather than an exact rate, the school is placed within its band using a stable, ID-derived offset, so its position is consistent across visits.

Proficiency by household income

English language arts

Grade 3Lower-income15%Higher-income14%1 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income11%Higher-income17%6 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income17%Higher-income17%0 pp gap

Grade 6Lower-income14%Higher-income28%14 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income17%Higher-income26%9 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income14%Higher-income12%2 pp gap

Mathematics

Grade 3Lower-income5%Higher-income8%3 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income3%Higher-income15%12 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income3%Higher-income12%9 pp gap

Grade 6Lower-income7%Higher-income11%4 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income7%Higher-income11%4 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income9%Higher-income10%2 pp gap