Original Research by School Decision on Hazelton-moffit-braddock High School
Hazelton-Moffit-Braddock High School sits in one of North Dakota's smallest, most rural communities. The town of Hazelton, in Emmons County, bills itself as the "Flax capital of the Nation," a nod to its origins as a Northern Pacific Railroad town site and its enduring agricultural identity. The economy runs on farming, educational services, and construction, with the school district itself serving as one of the primary employment anchors. There is no commercial corridor to speak of, no public transit, and residents are heavily car-dependent. The built environment is low-density housing and open farmland, and the school sits within a community where everything is close together by necessity. For a family considering this school, the setting is genuinely rural in every sense of the word.
The community has been losing population for decades, and city leaders have tried offering free land and startup money to attract new residents. Median property values remain far below national averages, though they have risen recently. Housing here is inexpensive relative to most of the country, which can make relocation practical for families drawn to rural life. The trade-off is limited housing stock and no sign of major new development.
The school itself serves grades seven through twelve and is very small, with an enrollment that places it among the tiniest secondary schools in the state. Class sizes across each grade are uneven, with some grades holding only a handful of students. The student body is nearly entirely white, with only a couple of students identifying otherwise. About a third of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch. Data on English learners and special education populations was not reported, so those dimensions of the student body are not visible here.
Academically, the most recent state assessment results give a mixed picture. English language arts proficiency sits just above the halfway mark, and science proficiency is higher still, landing solidly in the majority-proficient range. Mathematics is the clear soft spot, with well under half of students testing proficient. A parent weighing this school should ask how math instruction is structured in such a small setting, where a single teacher may cover multiple grade levels or subjects. The school does not have prior-year trend data available, so there is no way to tell from the provided data whether these results represent improvement, decline, or stability. This is a single-year snapshot.
Graduation rate data was not provided, nor were civil-rights indicators such as discipline or harassment reports. Program offerings, course access, staffing details, and attendance figures were also absent. For a school this small, some of those gaps reflect the reality of a rural secondary program with limited specialized staff and a lean curriculum. Advanced coursework, career and technical education pathways, and dual-credit opportunities, if they exist, are not documented in the available data. A family interested in college preparation or vocational training should ask the district directly what is available, possibly through cooperative arrangements with neighboring districts or online providers.
No neighbor comparison data was provided to position this school against others in the county or region, so it is difficult to say how it stacks up relative to nearby rural peers. The district brief also turned up no recent parent-relevant changes or strategic initiatives.
What the picture does show is a very small, rural, community-rooted school where students get close attention by virtue of small classes, and where science and English results are reasonably strong for a school of this size. The mathematics results are a genuine area to investigate. Families drawn to agricultural small-town life, low housing costs, and a setting where the school is a central civic institution will find a familiar rural pattern here. Those wanting broad course offerings, diverse peers, or documented college and career pathways will need to look carefully at what the district can deliver, and at what it cannot.
See more original research from School Decision →