Original Research by School Decision on Lidgerwood Elementary School
Lidgerwood Elementary School sits in the small rural town of Lidgerwood, in North Dakota's Richland County, part of the Wahpeton micropolitan area. The town styles itself with the motto "Small Town, Big Traditions," and civic life centers on recurring gatherings like Heritage Days, summertime Burgers in the Park, and monthly Cruise Nights. Manufacturing is a recognized employment sector locally, and some residents likely commute toward Wahpeton for work. The community has seen long-term population decline typical of small rural North Dakota towns, though recent estimates suggest a slight rebound and relative stabilization. The housing market here is quite affordable compared with state and national benchmarks, with home values well below the state figure, and the recent trend shows a modest decline in values rather than appreciation. Rental data was not available for this area.
The school serves pre-kindergarten through sixth grade as a regular public school in Lidgerwood Public School District 28. Enrollment is small, with roughly a dozen or fewer students per grade level. The student body is predominantly white, with small representation across Hispanic, American Indian, and multiracial students. About two-fifths of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch. Data on English learners and students receiving special education services was not reported, so those populations cannot be characterized here. The school is not a charter or magnet school. Title I status was not available in the data provided.
On state assessments, Lidgerwood Elementary uses the ND A-PLUS assessment, which is newly implemented with changed cut scores. Because of these changes, trend comparisons to prior years are not possible, so parents should treat the current results as a baseline rather than a measure of improvement or decline. Participation rates were reported at a level that falls below full participation, which is worth noting; a parent may want to ask the school about participation and whether any factors affected testing.
Across most tested grades, proficiency in math fell in the lower range. One grade level showed a somewhat higher band in math, but the overall picture is one where most grade levels landed in the lower proficiency ranges. In English language arts, results were similar, with most grades in the lower band, though one grade level showed a stronger result in the mid-to-upper range. Science results were also in the lower range for the grades tested. The aggregate proficiency rate across all grades and subjects was low, and these results represent the most recent available year only.
One data issue deserves mention. The school's listed grade range is pre-kindergarten through sixth grade, yet the assessment data includes results for seventh and eighth grades, which this school does not appear to serve based on its enrollment counts. The reason for this discrepancy is not clear from the available data. It may reflect a district-level reporting artifact or a shared identifier, but the data does not explain it, so parents verifying results should confirm with the district which school and grades those figures pertain to.
Because this is an elementary school serving only through sixth grade, there is no graduation rate to report, and that metric does not apply here. Similarly, no Advanced Placement, dual-credit, or career pathway offerings were listed in the data, which is typical for a school serving this grade band. No data on course access, staffing ratios, attendance, or discipline was available, so those dimensions cannot be described.
The broader district context offered little in the way of recent parent-relevant changes. A search for budget, curriculum, referendum, or property tax developments turned up only basic directory information, with no confirmed lasting changes to report.
For a family considering this school, the picture is one of a very small rural elementary school in an affordable community with strong local traditions. The academic results, based on a single year of a new state assessment, sit in the lower proficiency ranges across most grades and subjects. Given the small class sizes, results can swing meaningfully with just a few students, and the new assessment framework means there is no prior baseline for comparison. A parent weighing this school would benefit from asking the district about the grade-range discrepancy in the testing data, the participation rate, and what supports are in place for students performing below proficiency.
See more original research from School Decision →