Original Research by School Decision on Mt Pleasant High School
Mt. Pleasant High School sits in Rolla, a small rural community that serves as the county seat of Rolette County, North Dakota. The town carries the motto "Pride of the Prairie," and its built environment is what you would expect of a small prairie seat: highways running through or near it, a courthouse and city offices anchoring civic life, a small park and outdoor pool for residents. Publicly reported data describes a town that has been losing population over recent years, with no new housing developments or growth projects surfaced in research. The school itself operates as a regular public school serving grades seven through twelve, part of the Mt. Pleasant 4 district.
The enrollment is small, spread across six grade levels, which means class sizes are tight and students likely know nearly everyone in the building. The student body is roughly evenly split between white students and American Indian or Alaska Native students, with a small share identifying as two or more races. A substantial share of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch. Information on students with individualized education programs and English learners was not reported, so those populations cannot be characterized here.
On the academic side, the most recent state assessment results, from the 2024-25 school year, paint a mixed picture. English language arts proficiency sits near the midpoint, with roughly half of students meeting proficiency. Math and science results are considerably lower, with only about a fifth of students proficient in each subject. Only a single year of data was available, so there is no trend to describe and no way to tell whether these numbers represent a decline, a plateau, or an upward shift from a lower baseline. A parent may want to look into this further with the school, particularly in math and science, to understand what supports are in place and how the curriculum is structured across the grade bands.
Several categories that parents often ask about were not available in the provided data. No program offerings were listed, so it is unclear what electives, career and technical education, dual-credit, or advanced coursework options exist. No staffing information was provided. No attendance or discipline data was reported. No graduation rate was included in the data sections. No civil-rights data was supplied. Housing values and rents were not available for the community, so the housing market picture is incomplete. A neighbor comparison was not provided, so the school cannot be positioned against nearby districts or schools. For many of these gaps, the small size and rural setting of the school may partly explain why certain measures are thin or absent, but the data itself does not state a reason.
The district brief turned up no recent parent-relevant changes such as property-tax shifts, curriculum reforms, bond issues, or referendums. The district operates two schools covering pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade. Beyond that, nothing surfaced that would signal a shift in direction.
What a family can take from this is a portrait of a small, rural, secondary school in a quiet county-seat town with a diverse student body and one year of state test results showing moderate ELA proficiency and low math and science proficiency. The small scale likely means close teacher-student relationships and a tight peer group. The academic numbers in math and science are the area most worth asking about directly, and the absence of program, staffing, and graduation data means a visit or a call to the school would be the next practical step for a parent trying to decide whether this is the right fit.
See more original research from School Decision →