Pollard Elementary School, Plaistow NH

Original Research by School Decision on Pollard Elementary School

Pollard Elementary School sits on Main Street in Plaistow, a small Rockingham County town whose identity splits between a busy commercial corridor and a quieter village center. Publicly reported sources describe Plaistow as a regional shopping destination, with chain stores and local businesses strung along the Route 125 corridor that draws traffic from surrounding towns and from nearby Haverhill, Massachusetts. Away from that highway strip, the town settles into residential neighborhoods and a compact traditional center along Main Street, where Town Hall sits on the green. Walkability is limited; the built environment is auto-dependent, and day-to-day street life is minimal outside of events like the annual Old Home Day parade. Interstate 495 is accessible just south of the state line, and a freight and Amtrak rail line runs through town, with the nearest Downeaster passenger stations in Haverhill and Exeter. An MBTA commuter rail extension from Haverhill into Plaistow was proposed and declined.

Pollard is a regular public school serving prekindergarten through grade five, part of the Timberlane Regional School District, which also covers Atkinson, Danville, and Sandown. The middle and high school campus sits apart from the Main Street center. The district brief turned up no parent-relevant changes with lasting impact in recent reporting, so there is little to relay on that front.

On state assessments, the most recent NH SAS results paint a mixed picture. In math, proficiency in grades three and four lands in the mid-range, with just under half of tested students meeting or exceeding the standard. Grade five math drops off sharply, with only a small share of students reaching proficiency. In English language arts, the pattern reverses: grades three and four sit below the halfway mark, while grade five shows a stronger result, with a clear majority of students proficient. Science, tested only in grade five, lands below the middle of the range. Participation is essentially universal across all tested grades and subjects. Trend data was not available, so there is no way to read whether these results represent a shift from prior years. The grade five math result stands out as a soft spot, and a parent may want to look into this further with the school, particularly given that grade five ELA and science performance tells a different story for the same cohort.

The student body is modest in size for an elementary serving this grade band. A small share of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, which is consistent with the broader economic profile of the area. The enrollment is predominantly white, with a smaller Hispanic population and a small multiracial group. Data on individualized education programs and English learner status was not reported, so those pictures remain incomplete.

The housing market in Plaistow's zip code carries typical values above the national benchmark but roughly in line with the New Hampshire state average. Rockingham County's market is active, with listings moving quickly and a median listing price that sits well above the state level. Inventory has been climbing, and homes are selling faster than a year ago. The price-to-income ratio is elevated, and estimated monthly mortgage costs are substantial, which reflects the broader cost-of-carrying homeownership in the region. Rent data was not available for this location.

Several pieces a parent might look for are absent from the available data. Title I status, discipline records, course or program access, staffing details, and attendance information were not reported. Civil rights data and neighbor comparisons were also unavailable. What the data does show is a school in a small, commercially active town with mixed assessment results across grades and subjects, a relatively homogenous and economically stable student population, and a housing market that demands a serious financial commitment from families settling here.

See more original research from School Decision →

Academic performance

How students perform on state tests, by grade, set against the district.

Math

Grade 347%

School 47% · District 50% · ▼ 3 pts below district

▼ 7 pts below state median · ▼ 14 pts below county median

Grade 444%

School 44% · District 55% · ▼ 11 pts below district

▼ 6 pts below state median · ▼ 17 pts below county median

Grade 516%

School 16% · District 35% · ▼ 19 pts below district

▼ 23 pts below state median · ▼ 39 pts below county median

English language arts

Grade 341%

School 41% · District 46% · ▼ 5 pts below district

▼ 9 pts below state median · ▼ 15 pts below county median

Grade 441%

School 41% · District 56% · ▼ 15 pts below district

▼ 12 pts below state median · ▼ 21 pts below county median

Grade 555%

School 55% · District 63% · ▼ 8 pts below district

▼ 3 pts below state median · ▼ 12 pts below county median

Science

Grade 530%

School 30% · District 36% · ▼ 6 pts below district

▼ 5 pts below state median · ▼ 13 pts below county median

This schoolTimberlane Regional School District, same grade

Graduation rate (ACGR) reflects the federally published Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate for the most recent year available. We refresh this data annually at the close of each academic year in June. The federal source publishes a banded rate (for example, "90-94%") instead of an exact number for cohorts small enough to risk identifying individual students. The state distribution chart, where shown, plots every school in the state with a published rate or band; schools whose rate is federally suppressed are excluded. Where the federal source publishes a band rather than an exact rate, the school is placed within its band using a stable, ID-derived offset, so its position is consistent across visits.

Proficiency by household income

English language arts

Grade 3Lower-income28%Higher-income45%17 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income40%Higher-income41%1 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income31%Higher-income61%30 pp gap

Mathematics

Grade 3Lower-income17%Higher-income56%39 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income33%Higher-income48%15 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income13%Higher-income18%5 pp gap