The reported proficiency rate for English language arts is 24%.
Original Research by School Decision on San Rafael Elementary
San Rafael Elementary sits in the small rural community of San Rafael, an unincorporated census-designated place in Cibola County, New Mexico. The school serves kindergarten through sixth grade as part of the Grants/Cibola County Schools district. It is a regular public school, neither a charter nor a magnet, and it is very small, with only a handful of students per grade level. The campus sits on Mesa View Street, just off NM State Road 53, roughly five miles south of Grants, the county seat, where most civic and commercial activity in the region is concentrated.
The community around the school is quiet and low-density. San Rafael is residential in character, with dispersed homes along rural roads and no traditional walkable main street. The local economy is modest, driven partly by Route 66 tourism and ranching, with nearby El Malpais and El Morro National Monuments drawing visitors through the area. Publicly reported data describes median household income here as below the New Mexico state median, and housing values reflect an affordable rural market. No major new residential developments or significant growth projects were identified, so the community reads as stable and slow-changing rather than expanding. The San Rafael Church, a historic Catholic parish, serves as the primary civic anchor. For services like libraries, parks, and broader shopping, residents typically travel the short distance into Grants.
The student body is predominantly Hispanic, with a smaller American Indian and Alaska Native presence and a very small number of white students. Nearly all students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, which places the school among those serving a high-poverty community. Data on English learners and students with individualized education programs was not reported, so those populations cannot be characterized here. A parent wanting to understand special education or language support services would need to ask the school directly.
On state assessments, the most recent results paint a mixed picture. In English language arts, roughly a quarter of tested students reached proficiency, which is below what most families would hope to see but not unusual for a high-poverty rural school with a small tested group. In math, proficiency fell into the lowest reporting band, with only a handful of students clearing the proficient threshold. Science results were suppressed, likely because the number of tested students in the relevant grades was too small to report reliably. This kind of suppression is common in very small schools and does not by itself indicate a problem, but it does mean families have limited information to go on for science. Only a single year of data was available, so no trend can be described. Average scale scores were not reported for any subject, and participation rates were missing as well.
The school's small size is a defining feature. With only a few dozen students total across seven grade levels, children here learn in an intimate setting where classmates and teachers are closely acquainted. That can mean strong relationships and individual attention, but it also means fewer classmates per grade, fewer specialized staff, and a thinner range of programs than larger schools can offer. No course access, staffing, discipline, or attendance data was provided, so the narrative cannot speak to those dimensions. No information about after-school programs, extracurriculars, or specific instructional approaches was available either.
The district brief for Grants/Cibola County Schools did not surface any parent-relevant changes from recent years, so there is little to report on strategic direction or recent initiatives. A family considering this school would be choosing a very small, community-rooted, rural elementary with a high-need student population and academic results that suggest room for growth. The strengths here are likely relational and contextual rather than academic, and the gaps in available data mean a visit and direct conversation with school leadership would be the best next step for any parent weighing enrollment.
See more original research from School Decision →