The top reported proficiency rate is 32% in English language arts. The lowest is 24% in Science.
Original Research by School Decision on Questa Jr High
Questa Junior High sits in a small village in Taos County, serving the middle grades for the Questa Independent School District. It is a regular public school for grades six through eight, with a small enrollment that reflects the rural community around it. The student body is predominantly Hispanic, and nearly every student qualifies for free or reduced-price lunch, which places this school among the highest-poverty campuses in the state.
The village of Questa functions as a regional hub for even smaller outlying communities scattered across northern Taos County, including Lama, Cerro, Sunshine Valley, Latir, Costilla, and Amalia. The local economy was historically built on agriculture and the Chevron molybdenum mine, which was once the largest private employer in the county before its permanent closure. Chevron continues reclamation work on the Superfund site, and the village is navigating a post-mining transition toward eco-tourism and outdoor recreation, drawing on its position near the Rio Grande del Norte National Monument and the Carson National Forest. A portion of the working population commutes to Taos, Red River, and Angel Fire for hospitality jobs. Agriculture, especially alfalfa, hay, and winter wheat, has seen renewed interest, and the acequia irrigation system remains a central civic and social institution. The village has experienced slow population decline, and no major new housing developments were identified in publicly reported sources.
The school's academic results are mixed and, in one subject, concerning. In English language arts, roughly a third of tested students reached proficiency on the most recent state assessment. Science proficiency was lower, with about a quarter of tested students meeting the benchmark. Math results were the weakest area, with proficiency falling into the lowest reported band. A parent looking at these math results may want to ask the school directly what interventions and supports are in place, because the current numbers suggest a substantial gap between where students are and where the state expects them to be.
Several pieces of information that would help round out the picture are missing. The data does not include individualized education program rates, English learner rates, staffing figures, attendance data, discipline records, or course access details. Title I status was not reported. No neighbor comparison was available, and the school's specific locale classification was not provided. Civil rights data was also absent from the available records. These gaps mean the portrait here is narrower than what a family might want before making a decision.
The district brief turned up no recent policy changes, curriculum updates, or other deliberate district actions that clear a lasting-impact threshold. No information on program offerings such as advanced coursework, dual credit, or career pathways was available for this school, which is not unusual for a small middle school in a rural district but does limit what can be said about the academic pathway beyond the core curriculum.
What this school offers is a small, tight-knit middle school environment in a community with deep agricultural roots and an economy in transition. The peer environment is intimate by necessity, with only a few dozen students per grade level. For a family already rooted in Questa or one of the surrounding communities, this is the local option, and the small size means students are likely to be known by name. The academic data, particularly in math, is an area where families would be well served to ask direct questions about what the school is doing to strengthen instruction and support.
See more original research from School Decision →