The top reported proficiency rate is 28% in English language arts. The lowest is 20% in Math.
Original Research by School Decision on Cherokee Ms
Cherokee Middle School serves grades six through eight in the town of Cherokee, the county seat of Alfalfa County in northwestern Oklahoma. The school is part of the Cherokee district and is the only middle school in the town. The student body is small, with enrollment totaling fewer than one hundred students, and is predominantly white, with Hispanic students and students of two or more races each making up a modest share and a handful of students identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, or Black. The school does not serve high school grades, so there is no graduation rate to report.
Cherokee itself is a rural community that functions as a regional trade and service center for the surrounding wheat-growing area. The town has seen steady population decline over several decades, and its housing stock is notably affordable, with median home values well below the state average. The cost of living is low, and the area is classified as mostly rural. The largest employment sectors in town are retail trade, educational services, and transportation and warehousing. The community has a traditional small-town layout with a Main Street commercial core, a county courthouse, three parks, and a swimming pool. Most residents commute by private vehicle.
On the most recent state assessments, Cherokee Middle School's results were mixed and came with some gaps in the data. In math for grades six and seven, the proficiency rate for all students was suppressed, meaning the state did not release a reported figure, though the number of students tested was reported. For grade eight math, where a figure was reported, the share of students scoring proficient or above was well below the state average. In English language arts, the reported figures for grades six and seven showed roughly a quarter to a third of students at the proficient level, while the grade eight result was suppressed. Science results for grade eight were also suppressed. The school performed a bit better on an overall proficiency index compared to other districts in Alfalfa County, landing above the midpoint, but the index is based on the limited data that was reported, and the county is a very small comparison set.
The data for free or reduced-price meal eligibility, special education identification, and English learner status were all missing, so a parent cannot determine from this profile how many students come from low-income households or receive specialized support. Similarly, information on discipline, staffing, course access, and attendance was not available, leaving gaps in the picture of the school environment.
What a family considering this school can see is a very small rural middle school in a shrinking town with affordable housing and a quiet, low-cost way of life. The academic results that are visible suggest that a sizable share of students are not reaching grade-level proficiency in math and reading, and the pattern across tested grades is uneven. Because several proficiency figures were suppressed and the state changed its cut scores between testing years, it is difficult to pin down a clear trend. A parent may want to ask the school directly about classroom supports, curriculum focus, and how the school addresses the subjects where performance appears low. The absence of data on special populations and student climate means a family should follow up on those questions in person.
See more original research from School Decision →