W. C. Sullivan Middle, Rock Hill SC

Original Research by School Decision on W. C. Sullivan Middle

W. C. Sullivan Middle is a regular public school serving grades six through eight in Rock Hill, a city in York County that sits just south of Charlotte along the I-77 corridor. Rock Hill is the most populous city in the county, home to Winthrop University and a historic downtown, and its economy has shifted over the past decade from a textile past to a manufacturing-oriented base. The school is part of the York 03 district, known locally as Rock Hill Schools.

The student body is diverse. White students make up the largest group, followed by Black students, then Hispanic students. A substantial share of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, giving the school a higher-need profile than some peers in the area. Enrollment by grade level is fairly even across sixth, seventh, and eighth grades, and the school is large enough to sustain a range of course sections. No data on the share of students receiving special education services or English learner support was reported, which is a gap a parent may want to follow up on with the school directly.

State testing results on the SC Ready assessment show a significant split between English language arts and math. In ELA, across the three grades tested, roughly a majority of students scored at levels 3 or 4, meaning they met or exceeded expectations. This performance is not at the top of what the county sees, but it is solid and suggests that many students are on track in reading and writing. In math, the picture is notably weaker. In sixth grade roughly two in five students scored proficient; in seventh grade it was about one in four; in eighth grade about one in five. Overall, the school’s combined proficiency index across subjects and grades landed well below the middle of the pack when stacked against the four other districts in York County. This math outcome is a distinct soft spot, and a parent considering this school would want to ask how the school supports students who are behind in math and what interventions or curriculum adjustments are in place.

One improvement to note: South Carolina changed the cut scores for ELA and science assessments in recent years, which makes direct year-over-year trend comparisons unreliable. Only a single year of data was available for the current assessment framework, so it is not possible to say whether scores have been moving up or down.

Science testing data was provided for sixth grade only, with about half of students scoring proficient. That is a single data point, not a full school picture. Social studies data was from the previous assessment system and is too old to carry weight.

The school serves a middle-school-only grade band, so there is no graduation rate to consider. That metric is simply not applicable here.

Rock Hill itself is a growing city, described publicly as a blend of historic charm and responsible expansion. The district has been reorganizing some elementary schools into magnet and choice programs, which indicates an active approach to program variety even if W. C. Sullivan Middle itself is not flagged as a magnet or choice school. District enrollment has declined over recent years, a trend that can affect funding and staffing decisions in schools across the system.

For housing context, the typical home value in the area sits somewhat below the national benchmark, and rents rose over the past year. The local market is moderately priced compared to the broader region, and the city’s mix of college presence, manufacturing employment, and civic amenities like parks and a riverfront gives it a stable feel.

W. C. Sullivan Middle is a school where a family will find a diverse, economically mixed student body and a staff that produces reasonable ELA results. The math proficiency numbers are plainly lower than what many families hope to see, and this is the central question a parent should bring to a visit or conversation with the school. The district’s broader move toward specialized programs may offer pathways at the elementary and high school level, but this middle school appears to operate as a traditional neighborhood school without a special theme or admissions screen.

See more original research from School Decision →

Academic performance

How students perform on state tests, by grade, set against the district.

Math

Grade 644%

School 44% · District 37% · ▲ 7 pts above district

▲ 10 pts above state median · ▼ 8 pts below county median

Grade 724%

School 24% · District 29% · ▼ 4 pts below district

▼ 4 pts below state median · ▼ 14 pts below county median

Grade 820%

School 20% · District 22% · ▼ 2 pts below district

▼ 6 pts below state median · ▼ 22 pts below county median

English language arts

Grade 663%

School 63% · District 56% · ▲ 7 pts above district

▲ 10 pts above state median · ▼ 7 pts below county median

Grade 762%

School 62% · District 57% · ▲ 5 pts above district

▲ 6 pts above state median · ▼ 8 pts below county median

Grade 853%

School 53% · District 54%

even with state median · ▼ 11 pts below county median

Science

Grade 649%

School 49% · District 44% · ▲ 5 pts above district

▲ 5 pts above state median · ▼ 12 pts below county median

Social studies

Grade 759%

School 59% · District 64% · ▼ 5 pts below district

▼ 6 pts below state median · ▼ 21 pts below county median

This schoolYork 03, same grade

Graduation rate (ACGR) reflects the federally published Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate for the most recent year available. We refresh this data annually at the close of each academic year in June. The federal source publishes a banded rate (for example, "90-94%") instead of an exact number for cohorts small enough to risk identifying individual students. The state distribution chart, where shown, plots every school in the state with a published rate or band; schools whose rate is federally suppressed are excluded. Where the federal source publishes a band rather than an exact rate, the school is placed within its band using a stable, ID-derived offset, so its position is consistent across visits.

Proficiency by household income

English language arts

Grade 6Lower-income51%Higher-income85%34 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income54%Higher-income76%22 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income44%Higher-income73%29 pp gap

Mathematics

Grade 6Lower-income28%Higher-income69%41 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income14%Higher-income41%27 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income15%Higher-income30%16 pp gap