Fort Mill Elementary, Fort Mill SC

Original Research by School Decision on Fort Mill Elementary

Fort Mill Elementary is a regular public school serving prekindergarten through fifth grade in the York 04 district, a fast-growing system in the Charlotte, North Carolina, metro area. The school itself is situated in the town of Fort Mill, a former textile mill town that has rapidly transformed into a commuter and family-oriented suburb, now one of the fastest-growing communities in South Carolina. The town’s historic downtown district sits a short walk from Walter Elisha Park, and a major annexation recently doubled the town’s physical size. New mixed-use developments like Kingsley and the construction of residential subdivisions are driving this growth, which is also felt acutely in the school district.

The school’s student body is diverse and reflective of a changing community. Just over half of students are White, with the remainder composed of Black, Hispanic, Asian, and multiracial students. A substantial share of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, indicating a meaningful segment of families with lower household incomes. The school serves as a significant anchor within its attendance zone, and the district’s rapid enrollment growth has prompted a recent bond referendum to fund a new elementary school and other facility upgrades, as well as redistricting efforts to balance enrollment across schools. These changes mean that attendance boundaries are not static and families moving into the area should verify their zoned school.

Academically, the picture is mixed and shows variation by grade and subject. In English language arts, proficiency rates are strongest and are generally at levels that would be considered solid across most tested grades. In math, the pattern is less consistent; one tested grade shows a proficiency rate that is moderately strong, while another shows a weaker result that a parent may want to look into further with the school. Across all tested subjects and grades, the school’s overall proficiency index places it above the midpoint relative to other districts in York County, but it does not reach the highest levels seen in the county. In science, the single tested grade shows a result that sits in a middle band. There is no data available on chronic absenteeism or special education and English learner populations, which are both important context for understanding the full student support picture.

The school’s housing market context matters for families considering a move. Home values in the Fort Mill area are elevated relative to state and national averages, and rents follow a similar pattern, reflecting the area’s desirability and proximity to Charlotte. The estimated monthly mortgage payment for a median-priced home is substantial, and while rents are lower than that payment, they still represent a notable share of median household income. The area’s major employers include large corporate offices for financial services, automotive, and technology firms, as well as light industrial operations drawn by the I-77 corridor and proximity to Charlotte Douglas International Airport.

For a parent or resident, Fort Mill Elementary offers a neighborhood school in a community undergoing sustained, rapid growth. The academic results point to real strengths in reading and writing across the elementary grades, while math performance is more uneven and warrants attention. The school is part of a district that is actively building new capacity and adjusting attendance zones, so a family’s direct experience will be shaped by which school their child is ultimately zoned for and when those changes take effect. The town itself provides a walkable historic core, extensive greenway and park access, and a strong employment base, but much of the housing stock is in suburban subdivisions that require a car.

See more original research from School Decision →

Academic performance

How students perform on state tests, by grade, set against the district.

Math

Grade 365%

School 65% · District 77% · ▼ 13 pts below district

▲ 12 pts above state median · ▲ 1 pts above county median

Grade 460%

School 60% · District 76% · ▼ 16 pts below district

▲ 9 pts above state median · ▼ 2 pts below county median

Grade 540%

School 40% · District 66% · ▼ 25 pts below district

▼ 4 pts below state median · ▼ 14 pts below county median

English language arts

Grade 371%

School 71% · District 84% · ▼ 13 pts below district

▲ 12 pts above state median · even with county median

Grade 480%

School 80% · District 83% · ▼ 3 pts below district

▲ 18 pts above state median · ▲ 8 pts above county median

Grade 571%

School 71% · District 83% · ▼ 12 pts below district

▲ 11 pts above state median · ▼ 1 pts below county median

Science

Grade 460%

School 60% · District 70% · ▼ 11 pts below district

▲ 15 pts above state median · ▲ 1 pts above county median

Social studies

Grade 586%

School 86% · District 91% · ▼ 5 pts below district

▲ 15 pts above state median · ▲ 6 pts above county median

This schoolYork 04, same grade

Graduation rate (ACGR) reflects the federally published Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate for the most recent year available. We refresh this data annually at the close of each academic year in June. The federal source publishes a banded rate (for example, "90-94%") instead of an exact number for cohorts small enough to risk identifying individual students. The state distribution chart, where shown, plots every school in the state with a published rate or band; schools whose rate is federally suppressed are excluded. Where the federal source publishes a band rather than an exact rate, the school is placed within its band using a stable, ID-derived offset, so its position is consistent across visits.

Proficiency by household income

English language arts

Grade 3Lower-income55%Higher-income80%26 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income70%Higher-income83%13 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income48%Higher-income84%36 pp gap

Mathematics

Grade 3Lower-income52%Higher-income72%20 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income33%Higher-income69%36 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income12%Higher-income56%45 pp gap