Original Research by School Decision on Pee Dee Math Sci & Tech
Pee Dee Math Science & Tech Academy is a public charter school serving kindergarten through twelfth grade in Bishopville, a small rural town that is the county seat of Lee County in South Carolina’s Pee Dee region. The school operates under the SC Public Charter School District, a statewide authorizer rather than a traditional geographic district, and is classified as a regular school. Its name signals a stated focus on mathematics, science, and technology, though specific program offerings are not detailed in the available data.
Bishopville itself is a place shaped by its agricultural heritage, especially cotton production, and its economy has struggled. The population has been declining, poverty is widespread, and median household income is low. Housing values in the area are modest and have seen a recent decrease. Civic life centers on a historic downtown with the county courthouse, museums, and a noted topiary garden, but the town is auto-oriented and schools are on separate campuses. For families considering the area, the local economic challenges are a relevant context.
The school is small, with a student body that is predominantly African American, along with a notable share of White students and small numbers of students from other racial backgrounds. Every student enrolled qualifies for free or reduced-price lunch, reflecting the high poverty level of the community. Information on students with disabilities and English learners was not available.
Academic performance results are limited. South Carolina state testing data for the most recent year is largely suppressed because the tested grade-level groups are too small to report publicly—a standard privacy protection that affects many small schools. This means that for math, English language arts, and science at each tested grade, proficiency rates were not released. The school does have an aggregate measure across all grades for the same year, showing that roughly a third of students were proficient in English language arts and about a quarter were proficient in math, but these figures come with the caveat that cut-score changes on state tests make year-to-year comparisons uncertain, and the suppression of individual grade results limits a deeper understanding. A parent would want to ask the school directly for more granular classroom data.
No graduation rate was available in the data, and the school’s civil rights discipline data, course access, staffing, and chronic absenteeism information were also missing. These gaps mean that several dimensions a family might normally use to evaluate a school—how students progress through high school, what advanced or career-oriented courses are offered, and how the school handles discipline—are not visible from public records.
The school’s charter status and small size mean it operates with a degree of autonomy from traditional district constraints, though it is accountable to its authorizer. For a family, this school fits a particular profile: it is a small, all-grades setting in a rural, economically distressed community, with an academic identity tied to math, science, and technology. Parents who want to understand its strengths and weaknesses will need to go beyond state data and engage directly with the school leadership about curriculum, student outcomes, and the day-to-day learning environment. The limited public information makes that direct inquiry all the more necessary.
See more original research from School Decision →