American Leadership Academy South Carolina-lexington Campu, Lexington SC

Original Research by School Decision on American Leadership Academy South Carolina-lexington Campu

American Leadership Academy South Carolina-Lexington Campus is a public charter school serving kindergarten through twelfth grade in Lexington, a fast-growing suburb of Columbia. It operates as a regular school within the Charter Institute at Erskine, a statewide charter authorizer that has expanded to several dozen schools and was the subject of a state legislative audit review in 2025, an ongoing development families may want to track. The school itself is relatively new and has been adding grades upward; enrollment in the upper high school grades is notably smaller than in the lower and middle grades, meaning the high school experience is still taking shape.

Academically, the school shows a clear split by subject. English language arts proficiency is a consistent strength across tested grades, with most grade levels seeing strong majorities of students meeting state standards. Math achievement, however, is more uneven. Early elementary math results are solid, but proficiency declines steadily through the middle grades, and by eighth grade the share of students reaching the proficient mark is measurably lower. Science results in fourth and sixth grade fall in a middle range. Taken together, the school’s overall proficiency index places it in the top quarter of all districts in Lexington County, a notable position for a single school compared to entire districts. Because the school is still growing into a full K-12 program, it has no reported graduation rate yet, and families considering high school should look into what pathway options and advanced coursework are currently available.

The student body is predominantly white, with a substantial black enrollment and a smaller but present Hispanic share. Students of two or more races and Asian students also attend in smaller numbers. The share of students qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch is very low, which suggests a relatively affluent population. The school does not report data on students with disabilities or English learners, so parents with children in those categories may need to follow up with the school directly for details on supports.

Lexington itself is a thriving town with a historic downtown, the Icehouse Amphitheater, Lake Murray to the north, and a mix of older brick storefronts and suburban retail corridors. The town has grown rapidly, and the area around the school reflects that development. Home values in the school’s ZIP code are moderate compared to national averages, and rents are similarly positioned. The local economy is anchored by the school district, county government, and large retailers.

For a family considering this school, the academic portrait is one of strong literacy instruction against a backdrop of weakening math performance as students get older. The school’s charter status means it operates with some autonomy from traditional district bureaucracy and is accountable to the Charter Institute at Erskine. The small size of the upper high school grades suggests a limited menu of electives and Advanced Placement courses for now, though that could change as the school matures. Parents who value a school with a clear academic strength in reading and writing, a low-poverty student population, and a location in a growing suburban area may find this a good fit. Those concerned about math outcomes or looking for a fully developed high school program may want to ask the school directly about current course offerings and future plans.

See more original research from School Decision →

Academic performance

How students perform on state tests, by grade, set against the district.

Math

Grade 352%

School 52% · District 41% · ▲ 11 pts above district

▼ 1 pts below state median · ▲ 5 pts above county median

Grade 461%

School 61% · District 36% · ▲ 25 pts above district

▲ 11 pts above state median · ▲ 12 pts above county median

Grade 544%

School 44% · District 30% · ▲ 14 pts above district

▼ 1 pts below state median · ▲ 2 pts above county median

Grade 639%

School 39% · District 30% · ▲ 9 pts above district

▲ 5 pts above state median · ▲ 3 pts above county median

Grade 733%

School 33% · District 29% · ▲ 4 pts above district

▲ 5 pts above state median · ▲ 4 pts above county median

Grade 826%

School 26% · District 25% · ▲ 1 pts above district

even with state median · even with county median

English language arts

Grade 369%

School 69% · District 57% · ▲ 13 pts above district

▲ 10 pts above state median · ▲ 10 pts above county median

Grade 475%

School 75% · District 56% · ▲ 19 pts above district

▲ 13 pts above state median · ▲ 8 pts above county median

Grade 566%

School 66% · District 58% · ▲ 8 pts above district

▲ 6 pts above state median · ▲ 4 pts above county median

Grade 664%

School 64% · District 60% · ▲ 4 pts above district

▲ 11 pts above state median · ▲ 5 pts above county median

Grade 766%

School 66% · District 61% · ▲ 5 pts above district

▲ 10 pts above state median · ▲ 10 pts above county median

Grade 860%

School 60% · District 60%

▲ 7 pts above state median · ▲ 6 pts above county median

Science

Grade 455%

School 55% · District 40% · ▲ 15 pts above district

▲ 10 pts above state median · ▲ 10 pts above county median

Grade 663%

School 63% · District 47% · ▲ 17 pts above district

▲ 20 pts above state median · ▲ 19 pts above county median

This schoolCharter Institute at Erskine, same grade

Graduation rate (ACGR) reflects the federally published Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate for the most recent year available. We refresh this data annually at the close of each academic year in June. The federal source publishes a banded rate (for example, "90-94%") instead of an exact number for cohorts small enough to risk identifying individual students. The state distribution chart, where shown, plots every school in the state with a published rate or band; schools whose rate is federally suppressed are excluded. Where the federal source publishes a band rather than an exact rate, the school is placed within its band using a stable, ID-derived offset, so its position is consistent across visits.

Proficiency by household income

English language arts

Grade 3Lower-income62%Higher-income76%14 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income63%Higher-income83%20 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income51%Higher-income76%26 pp gap

Grade 6Lower-income57%Higher-income71%15 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income53%Higher-income75%23 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income56%Higher-income63%7 pp gap

Mathematics

Grade 3Lower-income45%Higher-income58%13 pp gap

Grade 4Lower-income46%Higher-income71%25 pp gap

Grade 5Lower-income34%Higher-income51%17 pp gap

Grade 6Lower-income31%Higher-income47%17 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income16%Higher-income45%29 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income19%Higher-income30%11 pp gap