The top reported proficiency rate is 36% in English language arts. The lowest is 14% in Math.
Original Research by School Decision on Edmunds Central Middle School - 02
Edmunds Central Middle School sits in Roscoe, a very small rural community in central Edmunds County, South Dakota. The town clusters around the junction of US Highway 12 and a state highway, with agricultural farmland stretching out in every direction. Roscoe's population has been in long-term decline since a mid-century peak, and publicly available sources describe no major housing developments or commercial growth projects on the horizon. The city's own website calls it a busy little town with many local businesses, but the civic footprint is modest: a city office open mornings on Mitchell Street, no parks or libraries identified in available sources, and no transit. The Edmunds Central School District, which combines students from Roscoe, Hosmer, and Bowdle, functions as one of the community's primary civic institutions.
The middle school itself serves grades six through eight with a very small enrollment. Classes are distributed across the three grades in roughly even fashion. The student body is predominantly white, with a small Hispanic presence and a single American Indian or Alaska Native student. Nearly half of the students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, which reflects the broader economic conditions of a declining rural area where the median household income sits below what many families would consider comfortable and the poverty rate is non-trivial. Data on individualized education programs and English learner status was not available, so those dimensions of student support cannot be characterized here.
On state assessments, the picture is mixed and, in one subject, incomplete. English language arts proficiency landed well below what most South Dakota schools would consider strong, with roughly a third of tested students meeting the proficient-or-above threshold. Math results were weaker still, with only a small fraction of students reaching proficiency. Full participation was reported for both subjects, so the results reflect the entire tested group rather than a partial sample. Science results were suppressed, which often reflects the small number of test-takers at a school of this size rather than any judgment about performance. Average scale scores were not reported for any subject. A parent weighing these numbers may want to look into what the school is doing to strengthen math instruction in particular, since that is where the gap between current results and state expectations is widest.
Several categories of information that parents often rely on were absent from the available data. No program offerings were listed, so it is not possible to say whether the school provides advanced coursework, career exploration, dual-credit opportunities, or extracurricular activities beyond the basic curriculum. No staffing figures were available, so class sizes and teacher support levels cannot be described. Attendance and discipline data were not provided. The school's Title I status was not reported, nor was a locale classification that would place it on the urban-to-rural spectrum used by federal reporting. Civil-rights data was empty, and no comparison fact-set was available to position this school against its neighbors in the county or the state.
What the data does convey is a school serving a very small, tight-knit rural community where resources are limited and the population base is shrinking. For a family living in or near Roscoe, the school's defining characteristics are its size and its setting. Thirty-some students across three grades means every teacher knows every student, and the peer group is small and stable. The trade-off is that academic results as measured by state tests are currently low, and the breadth of programs that a larger middle school might offer is not evident in the available record. Whether that environment fits a particular child depends heavily on what the family prioritizes: close attention and rural community closeness on one hand, or a wider range of academic pathways and stronger measured proficiency on the other.
See more original research from School Decision →