The top reported proficiency rate is 46% in Science. The lowest is 8% in English language arts.
Original Research by School Decision on Mcintosh Elementary - 02
McIntosh Elementary sits in the heart of one of South Dakota's smallest county seats. The town of McIntosh is a compact prairie community along US Route 12, entirely rural, with civic life and the school integrated into a small town center rather than spread across separate campuses. The school's address on Main Street places it at the core of daily life in a place where the primary employers are county government and the school district itself. The community has experienced steady population decline over recent decades, and no new housing developments or commercial growth initiatives surfaced in publicly reported sources. Housing vacancy is elevated. This is a contracting rural setting, not a growing one, and that context shapes everything about the school environment.
The school serves pre-kindergarten through fourth grade, with a very small total enrollment. Class sizes across the grade bands are tiny, which means children learn in an intimate setting where staff likely know every student and family by name. The student body is roughly split between white and American Indian or Alaska Native students, with a small number of children from other racial or ethnic backgrounds. Every student qualifies for free or reduced-price lunch, reflecting the limited economic circumstances of the surrounding community. Data on individualized education programs and English learner status was not available, so the picture of special populations is incomplete.
State assessment results for the most recent year show proficiency rates in both math and English language arts that are very low, with only a single tested student reaching proficient in each subject out of a small group of tested children. Because so few students sit for the exam, a shift of one or two students can move the rate dramatically, making year-to-year comparisons hard to read and single-year results easy to overinterpret. A parent looking at these numbers should keep in mind the very small testing pool and may want to ask the school how it tracks individual student growth over time, since a cohort this small does not lend itself to clean aggregate statistics. Science results from an earlier year showed a higher proficiency rate, but that data comes from a different assessment period with changes to the test name and cut scores, so it is not directly comparable.
Average scale scores were not reported for any subject, and no multi-year trend data was available. Civil rights data, discipline information, course access details, staffing numbers, and attendance figures were all absent from the available sources, so a reader cannot get a full picture of the school climate or resource allocation from this data alone. Title I status was not reported, though the universal free-or-reduced-price-lunch rate suggests the school likely serves a high-poverty population. Program offerings were not listed, which limits what can be said about extracurriculars, interventions, or specialized instruction.
The broader district context offers one encouraging thread. McIntosh School District began construction on a new school building, with the first phase covering preschool through junior high classrooms and special education spaces. For a district this small in a community this rural, that represents a substantial capital commitment and will reshape the physical learning environment for students across all grade levels. The town itself offers little in the way of amenities beyond the school and county functions. No public parks, library, or transit system were identified in available sources. East Lake sits about a mile outside of town, and the surrounding landscape is open prairie.
What this school offers is a very small, deeply rural, high-poverty elementary setting in a community that is investing in new facilities despite ongoing population decline. For families rooted in the area, the small scale means close attention and familiarity. The academic results as currently reported are low, and a parent would be right to ask the school directly about how it supports individual learners and what growth looks like for children across the year. The missing data on staffing, programs, discipline, and special populations leaves real gaps that the school itself would need to fill for a family wanting a complete picture.
See more original research from School Decision →