The top reported proficiency rate is 50% in English language arts. The lowest is 33% in Math.
Original Research by School Decision on Underhill Central School
Underhill Central School sits in the village of Underhill Center, a small residential community at the foot of Mount Mansfield in Chittenden County. The school serves children from pre-kindergarten through fourth grade and belongs to the Mount Mansfield Unified Union School District. It is a small school for its grade band, with enrollment spread across the early grades and a large pre-kindergarten cohort relative to the other grades.
The village itself is an unincorporated census-designated place centered at the intersection of River Road and Pleasant Valley Road. Publicly reported sources describe it as primarily residential with an affluent profile, high property values, and minimal commercial presence. The civic cluster includes the Town Hall, municipal offices, a recreation area with tennis courts and a swimming pond, a municipally owned sledding hill, and St. Thomas Catholic Church. There is no described commercial district, and the mountainous rural setting makes the area car-dependent. No major employers are identified for the village itself; residents likely commute toward Burlington for work. Growth is very slow, and housing availability is tight, with no vacant units reported in the available data and no large-scale developments mentioned.
The student body is nearly entirely white, with a small number of students identifying as Hispanic or as two or more races. A modest share of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, lower than what many schools in the region report. Data on individualized education programs and English learner status was not available, so those populations cannot be characterized here.
On Vermont's state assessment, the school tested third and fourth graders in math and English language arts. English language arts results were the stronger area, with a majority of third graders reaching proficiency and a smaller but still substantial share of fourth graders doing so. Math results were lower across both grades, with fewer than half of third graders proficient and a noticeably smaller share of fourth graders reaching that mark. The fourth-grade math result is the weakest reported figure, and a parent may want to look into this further with the school, particularly how instruction and support shift between third and fourth grade. Participation rates were not reported for any of the tested groups. No multi-year trend data was available, so it is not possible to say whether these results represent a recent change or a longer-standing pattern.
Because the school stops at fourth grade, there is no graduation rate, and that metric does not apply here. Chronic absenteeism data was also missing. The county-level comparison set, drawn from Chittenden County's districts, could not produce a usable proficiency index for this school because the comparable cohort was too small. The same set yielded no graduation comparison, again because the school does not serve the relevant grades. This means the available data positions the school primarily on its own reported results rather than against its neighbors.
No program offerings, course access details, staffing figures, discipline data, or attendance data were provided. The district brief turned up no parent-relevant changes meeting a lasting-impact threshold. A district merger and a facilities addition were noted in publicly reported material but both predate the recent window, so they are not treated as current developments.
What the picture supports is this. Underhill Central is a small, early-grades school in an affluent, tight-housing rural village with little commercial activity and a car-dependent layout. Its English language arts results are the clearer strength in the available data, while math, especially in fourth grade, is the area where the numbers are lowest and where a family might reasonably ask the school for more detail. The absence of several data fields, from special populations to program offerings to county-level benchmarking, means the portrait is incomplete, and a parent weighing this school would benefit from direct conversation with the administration about what the classroom experience looks like beyond what testing captures.
See more original research from School Decision →