School DecisionThe Newsroom
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2026
Beyond the headline
SCHOOLDECISION.COM/NEWSROOM
California · Innovation

LAUSD bars student generative AI on district devices for 2026-27, surprising board and parents

The nation's second-largest school district imposed a moratorium on student access to generative AI tools, affecting 378,000 students. The move was disclosed at a committee meeting without a board vote, as the district studies how to regulate the technology.

Los Angeles Unified School District has blocked all student access to generative artificial intelligence on district-issued devices for the 2026-27 school year, a practice change that was disclosed at the first meeting of the board's Generative AI Ad Hoc Committee on September 2, 2026. The announcement came as a surprise to board members and parents in attendance, according to LAist. No formal board vote approved the moratorium; it was described by the district as a practice rather than a board-adopted policy.

378,000Students affected by the LAUSD generative AI moratorium on district-issued devices [2]

How the moratorium works

The moratorium replaces a prior policy that allowed students aged 13 and older who completed Digital Citizenship instruction and acknowledged the Responsible Use Policy to access approved generative AI tools at teacher discretion. Students under 13 were previously not permitted to use generative AI tools under the district's Responsible Use Policy, according to the district's April 2024 AI guidelines (BUL-151113.0). Now, the web-filtering software Lightspeed prevents students from accessing any website or app categorized as an AI tool on LAUSD Chromebooks and tablets. The block applies even when a student signs into their district profile on a personal device, though the district cannot regulate personal accounts on personal devices, LAist reported.

Board Member Nick Melvoin acknowledged at the committee meeting that the moratorium was not well communicated, according to NBC Los Angeles. The committee, which includes Melvoin, Kelly Gonez, and Tanya Ortiz Franklin, is scheduled to meet through the 2026-27 school year to develop policy recommendations for full board consideration. Gonez, who chairs the committee, indicated at the meeting that the district is not currently providing any student with access to generative AI tools.

A parallel move in New York City

The same day, New York City Public Schools, the nation's largest district, announced a one-year moratorium on student-facing generative AI for grades 2K through 8 for the 2026-27 school year, affecting approximately 600,000 students. The New York policy, announced by the Mayor's office, explicitly exempts assistive technology provided through Individualized Education Programs or 504 plans, and English Language Learners retain access to necessary tools such as the DOE-created translation app. NYC is also disabling AI components in 38 existing ed tech contracts, including widely used reading tools. The policy allows five centrally approved high school pilots with teacher supervision.

The New York City policy drew criticism from the AI Moratorium Coalition, which had advocated for a two-year moratorium. The coalition expressed concern about the high school pilot program, questioning the lack of clear product evaluations and opt-in or opt-out structure, and flagged enforcement mechanisms, which NYC officials said would largely happen at the classroom and school level, according to K-12 Dive.

Research on AI in classrooms is mixed

LAUSD's April 2024 AI policy bulletin cited the U.S. Department of Education's May 2023 report, which advised prioritizing humans in the loop, aligning AI to shared educational vision, and developing education-specific guardrails. The Department of Education framework called for districts to develop education-specific guidelines and guardrails for AI use. The bulletin described AI as potentially supporting personalized learning, enhanced student achievement and engagement, increased access to information, and technological literacy.

At the New York City announcement, Mayor Mamdani stated that he had not seen a study showing AI is beneficial for elementary and middle school students, except for research sponsored by the corporations that stand to profit, according to a transcript from the mayor's office. That assertion was not accompanied by citation of specific studies. LAist reported that recent surveys indicate many students and educators are using AI, even as research about whether the tools help students learn is mixed, framing the policy debate as occurring in the absence of settled evidence on AI's educational benefits.

Analysis

By the School Decision Newsroom, written after the reporting above was filed.

District staff imposed the AI block on their own authority, reading the June screen-time vote as covering AI.

The LAUSD board voted unanimously in June 2026 to limit student screen time, but that resolution said nothing about generative AI. It created the ad hoc committee specifically to study the issue. Senior district administrators then decided on their own that blocking student AI access was in the spirit of complying with the screen-time policy. Board members Kelly Gonez and Nick Melvoin, both on the committee, said they were surprised by the move. The board that created a committee to study AI was told at that committee's first meeting that AI had already been shut off.

Five committee meetings are scheduled through April 2027; full board votes at the end of the school year.

The Generative AI Ad Hoc Committee meets next on October 21, 2026, then December 9, January 20, 2027, March 3, and April 7. All meetings are at 10 a.m. at the board room at 333 S. Beaudry Ave. The committee's recommendations go to the full seven-member board for a vote at the end of the 2026-27 school year. Until that vote, the moratorium continues as district practice with no expiration date. A parent who wants to weigh in should target the October meeting, before the committee begins drafting its recommendations.

The block stops at the device, not the student. Personal-device use is unregulated, and IEP exemptions are not spelled out.

LAUSD's moratorium applies only to district-issued Chromebooks and tablets, or to district profiles signed in on personal devices. Chief Academic Officer Pia Sadaqatmal confirmed there is no policy governing what students do with AI on their own phones or home computers. By contrast, New York City's moratorium explicitly protects assistive technology for students with IEPs and 504 plans and translation tools for English Language Learners. LAUSD's screen-time policy has a disability exemption, but whether it extends to AI-based assistive tools is not stated. Families relying on AI-adjacent tools in an IEP should verify the exemption in writing.

Sources

  1. NBC Los Angeles. Generative AI banned on LAUSD-issued devices for students View
  2. LAist. LAUSD students barred from AI use, in a surprise to school board and parents View
  3. LAist. How will LAUSD students use AI? Here's how you can help View
  4. LAUSD (official district bulletin BUL-151113.0). Guidelines for the Authorized Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for District Employees, Students, and Associated Persons View
  5. NYC Mayor's Office. Mayor Mamdani and Chancellor Samuels Put Students First with Nation's Broadest Generative AI Moratorium in Schools View
  6. New York City Public Schools. Guidance on Artificial Intelligence and Screen Time View
  7. K-12 Dive. New York City pauses AI use for elementary, middle school students View
  8. NYC Mayor's Office. Transcript: Mayor Mamdani Holds Press Conference To Make Education Announcement With Chancellor Samuels View
  9. Los Angeles Times. LAUSD enacts student AI moratorium: what parents need to know View
  10. LAist. New LAUSD screen time rules: No devices for youngest students, no YouTube for older grades View
  11. SpecialNeeds.com. What IEP Families Need to Know About Protecting Their Child's Assistive Technology View
LAUSD bars student generative AI on district devices for 2026-27, surprising board and parents | School Decision