School DecisionThe Newsroom
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2026
Beyond the headline
SCHOOLDECISION.COM/NEWSROOM
North Carolina · Policy & Funding

North Carolina budget provision expands book challenges to all residents, mandates districtwide panels

A budget provision changes North Carolina's school library challenge process from a local, optional system to a mandatory districtwide model, widening who can object and standardizing reviews across each district.

A provision in North Carolina's 2026 state budget overhauls how school districts handle challenges to library and instructional materials. The change replaces the former school-level review process with a single districtwide committee, allows any county resident to file objections, and makes a local school board's decision binding across the entire district. Prior law left the creation of such committees to each board's discretion.

What the new law requires

Under the budget legislation, every local school board must establish a community media advisory committee to review challenges. The committee must include three principals (one each from elementary, middle, and high school), three teachers (one each from the same levels), three school library media coordinators (one each from elementary, middle, and high school), and two parents (one of a high school or middle school student and one of an elementary school student).

The law specifies that challenges must claim materials are obscene, inappropriate to the age, maturity, or grade level of the students, or, for instructional materials, not aligned with the standard course of study. The committee makes a recommendation to the local board of education, which has final authority. The committee must hold a hearing within two weeks of a challenge and make a recommendation within two weeks after that hearing. School board decisions on challenged materials cannot be appealed.

2 weeksTime limit for the committee to hold a hearing after a challenge is filed. [4]

Key changes from prior law

The budget provision modifies G.S. 115C-98(b1), which previously stated that a local board of education "may establish a community media advisory committee" to investigate and evaluate challenges from parents, teachers, and members of the public. The new language changes the permissive "may" to the mandatory "shall." It also expands the pool of eligible challengers. Any county resident can now file an objection, even if they do not have a student enrolled in the district. Prior law restricted challenges to parents or guardians.

The new system also removes school-level review. Previously, if a book was challenged at one school, the decision applied only to that school. Under the new law, the board's decision applies districtwide.

Local district response

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools is among the districts now revising its policies to comply. In January 2024, the district's board approved a revised policy that limited formal objections to books and materials to students and parents or guardians of enrolled students. The new state law supersedes that local restriction, according to a WUNC report. The district's chief academic officer, Paula Wilkins, recently explained that committee members may rotate throughout the year to avoid burnout. The district has had only one formal challenge in the last four years.

Broader budget changes

The budget also phases out the Textbook Commission and updates language throughout state law to refer to "instructional materials." The new definition includes not only books but also digital resources, classroom kits, and activity-oriented programs.

Analysis

By the School Decision Newsroom, written after the reporting above was filed.

Florida ran this exact model. Removals doubled, and lawmakers had to cap non-parents.

Florida passed a nearly identical rule allowing any county resident to challenge school library materials, with the school board's decision final. In the 2023-24 school year, Florida districts removed 732 titles, nearly double the 386 pulled the year before. The volume led Florida lawmakers to pass HB 1285, which limits non-parent residents to one challenge per month. North Carolina's law contains no such rate limit, so a single resident could file objections against multiple books at once with nothing constraining the pace.

One successful challenge now strips a book from every school in the district, with no appeal.

The districtwide scope is the real force multiplier here. Under the old system, a challenge at one school affected only that building. Now a single successful objection from any county resident, including someone with no child enrolled anywhere, removes the title from every school in the district. The board's decision cannot be appealed. A parent whose child attends a school across the county could lose access to a book because of a complaint filed by a stranger, with no avenue to contest it.

Sources

  1. EdNC. NC passes 2026 budget with 8% average raise for teachers — and funds for literacy, math, and research View
  2. WUNC. NC law changes rules for challenging books in public schools View
  3. WFAE. NC law changes rules for challenging books in public schools View
  4. NC Newsline. The fine print: NC's $34B budget includes DEI cuts, ferry tolls, AI prison funds, and more View
  5. North Carolina General Assembly. G.S. 115C-98 — Local boards of education to provide for local operation of the textbook program View
  6. SpotOn North Carolina. WS/FCS board OKs limits on who can formally object to books, materials View
  7. Florida Phoenix. Department of Education reports near double increase in library book removals View
  8. Florida House of Representatives. Florida Statutes 1006.28 — Instructional materials for schools View
North Carolina budget provision expands book challenges to all residents, mandates districtwide panels | School Decision