School DecisionThe Newsroom
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2026
Beyond the headline
SCHOOLDECISION.COM/NEWSROOM
Texas · Policy & Funding

Texas HB 6 rewrites student discipline rules for 2025-26, expanding teacher removal and expulsion grounds

The law adds bullying as grounds for removal, permits removal after a single incident, removes time limits on in-school suspension, and expands expulsion authority to off-campus conduct. Districts are updating codes of conduct.

Texas House Bill 6, signed by Governor Abbott on June 20, 2025, takes effect for the 2025-2026 school year, rewriting student discipline rules under Chapter 37 of the Texas Education Code. The House passed the bill 124-20 on April 16, 2025; the Senate passed it 29-2 on May 22, 2025; and the House concurred in Senate amendments 114-19 on May 28, 2025, according to Texas Legislature Online.

Key changes to teacher authority and student sanctions

The law adds bullying as a new ground for teacher removal of a student from class, joining the existing grounds of repeated interference with learning and unruly or abusive behavior, according to the enrolled bill text. Teachers may now remove a student based on a single incident, removing the prior requirement that interference be documented as repeated. The law also eliminates the three-day cap on in-school suspension, though placements must be reviewed at least every 10 school days.

For students below third grade, out-of-school suspension is now authorized for conduct that threatens immediate health or safety, documented repeated or significant disruption, weapons offenses, and certain drug or alcohol offenses. Previous law limited such suspensions to conduct containing elements of a violent offense. Additionally, most mandatory expulsion offenses no longer require that the conduct occur on school property or at a school-sponsored activity; expulsion is required regardless of location.

The Texas Education Agency published its required parent overview, titled 'Overview of School Discipline for Parents,' on August 12, 2025, and districts are required to provide it to students and parents. The agency also issued an administrative letter detailing the changes, which include prohibiting TEA from withholding state funding based on the number of students disciplined.

District-level adoption underway

Cy-Fair Independent School District presented an updated student code of conduct at a board work session on August 7, 2025, listing seven key changes from HB 6. Among them were removal of the in-school suspension cap, additional out-of-school suspension criteria for students below grade three, expanded single-incident teacher removal authority, and expanded grounds for mandatory disciplinary alternative education program placement and expulsion. Board adoption was planned for August 11, according to Community Impact.

Navarro Independent School District's board considered on July 21, 2025 whether to adopt the optional parental involvement policy created by new section 37.0014 of the education code. District administration recommended against adoption, stating that existing disciplinary alternative education program intake and review practices already involve parents and allow for placement reduction. The board agenda item noted the decision was at the board's discretion.

Advocacy group raises concerns

The Intercultural Development Research Association, an education advocacy organization, published an analysis of the law stating that students may be removed from class more quickly than before and after only one incident or without supporting documentation. The group also said students face sanctions for an increased list of vague conduct offenses that may be connected to age-appropriate behavior or a manifestation of a disability. IDRA noted that disability protections under Section 37.004 for students receiving special education services were not removed by the law. This analysis is not peer-reviewed.

Analysis

By the School Decision Newsroom, written after the reporting above was filed.

The task force that motivated this bill recommended counseling and training. HB 6 delivers neither.

Governor Abbott's 2022 Teacher Vacancy Task Force found nearly 50 percent of Texas teachers cited discipline as a top concern, but its recommendations were more counseling staff, administrator training in positive school culture, and proactive student supports. Texas has 390 students per counselor against a nationally recommended 250:1. HB 6, authored by Rep. Jeff Leach, responds to the same frustration with expanded removal authority, which the task force never proposed. The bill treats a staffing and support problem as a rules problem.

The state is expanding the discipline pipeline and removing its own oversight of it.

HB 6 does two things at once. It lowers the threshold for removal, and it prohibits TEA from withholding state funding based on how many students a district disciplines. TEA has already removed special education discipline indicators from its Results Driven Accountability calculations, leaving only federal disproportionality requirements as a check. A parent whose child has an IEP should know that removal appeals go to the placement review committee or threat assessment team, not the ARD committee that normally handles special education decisions.

Other states have been narrowing exclusionary discipline for young children. Texas is widening it.

Maryland in 2017 barred suspensions for PreK through second grade except imminent threat of serious harm. Georgia the same year required multi-tiered supports before suspending young students. Connecticut in 2024 shortened its in-school suspension cap from 10 days to 5. The Education Commission of the States summarizes the research consensus: exclusionary discipline is linked to lower academic performance, higher dropout rates, and greater justice system involvement. Texas is moving against the direction every one of these states chose.

Sources

  1. Texas Legislature Online. 89(R) History for HB 6 View
  2. Texas Legislature. 89(R) HB 6 - Enrolled version - Bill Text View
  3. Texas Education Agency. Report Required by House Bill 6 | Texas Education Agency View
  4. Community Impact. See how new state education laws will show up in Cy-Fair ISD 2025-26 policies View
  5. Navarro Independent School District. Navarro ISD Board Agenda Item: HB 6 - Parental Involvement in Disciplinary Placement View
  6. Intercultural Development Research Association (IDRA). Impact of 2025 Texas School Discipline Laws on Your Children View
  7. Texas Tribune. Texas House bill would make it easier to suspend students View
  8. Texas Education Agency / Teacher Vacancy Task Force. Teacher Vacancy Task Force Final Report, February 2023 View
  9. Texas Education Agency. Update to 2025 and 2026 Results Driven Accountability Special Education Determination Calculations Regarding Discipline Indicators per HB 6 View
  10. Disability Rights Texas. Recent School Discipline Updates for 2025-2026 School Year View
  11. Education Commission of the States. The Status of School Discipline in State Policy View
  12. Maryland State Board of Education. Policy Impact Analysis: HB425/SB651 (2017) PreK-2 Suspension Policy Report View
Texas HB 6 rewrites student discipline rules for 2025-26, expanding teacher removal and expulsion grounds | School Decision