SchoolDecisionby Formative Spaces, Inc.
School DecisionThe Newsroom
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2026
Beyond the headline
SCHOOLDECISION.COM/NEWSROOM

Vermont's Act 170 creates seven regional education service areas and merger committees with tight deadlines

The law, signed June 18, replaces state-directed redistricting with a district-led merger process. CESAs are forming now, with merger committees required to start meeting by October 15.

Vermont's Act 170 (H.955), signed into law by Governor Phil Scott on June 18, 2026, establishes seven Cooperative Educational Service Areas (CESAs) effective July 1, 2026, and requires roughly 20 school district merger committees to begin meeting by October 15, 2026. The law represents a shift from the state-directed redistricting approach of Act 73 (2025) to a district-led, voluntary-merger process. In an August 19 letter, Scott urged school leaders not to slow down, saying the state has already waited too long and that every year of delay means unequal opportunities for students and tax increases families cannot afford.

What Act 170 creates

The seven CESAs rename and replace the former Boards of Cooperative Education Services (BOCES). Each supervisory union was assigned to a CESA, and each member supervisory union board had to appoint a CESA board director within 30 days of the act's passage. The superintendent of the largest member supervisory union was required to call the first CESA board meeting within 45 days to elect a chair and officers. Beginning July 1, 2026, each CESA must offer, when requested, services in special education (including tiered systems of support and low-incidence high-cost services), business and information technology administration, and union school district creation consultation and facilitation. By July 1, 2027, required services expand to include professional development, curriculum coordination, transportation, and facilities master planning. Each CESA must employ an executive director.

7Cooperative Educational Service Areas created under Act 170 [1]
20Suggested school district groupings for merger committees [3]

Timeline and deadlines

  • By September 15, 2026: Each school district must appoint at least one current board member to its assigned merger committee.
  • By October 1, 2026 (or September 1 per statute): The Vermont Learning Collaborative must hire seven regional facilitators and one lead facilitator.
  • By October 15, 2026: Each merger committee must hold its first meeting.
  • By September 1, 2027: Merger committees must complete final reports and transmit them with proposed articles of agreement if applicable to school boards, the Secretary of Education, and the State Board.
  • By December 15, 2027: The State Board of Education must issue findings.
  • On March 7, 2028: Voter referenda on proposed mergers will be held.

Implementation challenges

CESA board chairs report significant logistical challenges in establishing the new entities. The superintendent of the Harwood Unified Union School District, who serves as board chair of the Winooski Valley CESA, raised concerns about the ability of a newly formed governmental entity to cover expenses without established funding or financial systems. The superintendent of South Burlington, chair of the Chittenden Central CESA, sent an August 19 letter with 30 questions about the process to the governor, education secretary, and legislators. CESAs are funded through proportional membership fees, fees for services, and one-time startup grants of $15,000, along with $50,000 per CESA for hiring an executive director, though CESAs must front the costs and seek state reimbursement.

Precedent and evidence

Act 170 builds on Act 46 (2015), which the 2026 law's legislative findings describe as having achieved measurable administrative efficiencies, including reductions in per-pupil central office costs and elimination of duplicative governance structures, while maintaining or improving student opportunities in many regions. That assessment is a legislative finding, not an independent evaluation, and the qualifier suggests outcomes varied. Act 170 also replaces Act 73 (2025), which had mandated a state-directed redistricting process with a weighted student funding formula and statewide tax rate. The new law extends the timeline for that formula's implementation to July 1, 2029, and makes it contingent on further legislative action.

An opinion piece published by VTDigger on July 19, 2026 argues that Act 170 pays districts to merge but lacks an efficiency target, oversight body, or clear definition of success. The editorial notes that while the law provides incentives for consolidation, it does not specify measurable savings. This is an editorial assessment rather than a peer-reviewed study, but it highlights an unresolved question about whether the voluntary-merger framework will produce the efficiencies the governor has called for.

Foundation formula contingencies

The foundation formula and statewide tax rate established under Act 73 will not take effect until July 1, 2029, and only if the General Assembly receives required reports and enacts additional legislation addressing career and technical education funding, special education funding, sparsity measures, secondary student weighting, geographic cost differences, prekindergarten funding, and legacy collective bargaining agreements. Act 170 also introduces excess spending threshold penalties for districts that spend above a set per-pupil amount and prohibits any town or group of towns from withdrawing from a union school district through fiscal year 2035.

Districts that do not successfully merge by July 1, 2028 will be classified as eligible school districts and face a standalone merge process with a neighboring unified union school district. The State Board of Education must submit a report by November 1, 2029 identifying any district with fewer than 750 students that has not merged, with recommendations for further mergers.

Analysis

By the School Decision Newsroom, written after the reporting above was filed.

Vermont already merged districts under Act 46. The per-pupil savings never appeared.

Act 46 (2015) cut Vermont from 267 school districts to about 111 through voluntary and state-ordered mergers. The only causal analysis, a Yale thesis by Grace Miller presented to the Senate Education Committee in January 2026, found no significant reduction in per-pupil spending or its growth rate after merger. Merged districts saved roughly 6.5 percent on administration and contracted services but spent more on salaries, student support, materials, and transportation. The state never conducted its own evaluation. Act 170's legislative findings call Act 46 a success. The independent evidence says the savings moved around, they did not shrink.

The startup grants are trivial. The construction-aid gap is what could actually move districts.

Seven CESAs receive $15,000 each in one-time startup grants, and six receive $50,000 each for hiring an executive director. Total: about $405,000 to stand up seven regional entities required to offer special education, IT, and business services. The real financial lever is school construction aid. Consolidated districts qualify for up to 75 percent state aid on construction projects, versus 30 percent for unmerged districts. A district weighing merger is looking at that 45-point gap on a multimillion-dollar school project, not a $15,000 grant. Our read: the incentives point toward merger, not toward efficiency.

The state tried to draw new district maps itself and failed. That is why your local board is now doing it.

Act 73 (2025) created a School District Redistricting Task Force to propose new district boundaries for a legislative vote. The task force never produced recommendations, and the General Assembly did not enact new districts in 2026. Act 170 is the fallback. Instead of the state drawing maps, roughly 20 merger committees of local board members will study whether to consolidate, with voters deciding on March 7, 2028. The pivot to local control was not a philosophical preference. It was what remained after the top-down approach stalled. Whether district-led committees succeed where a state task force did not is the open question.

Sources

  1. Vermont General Assembly. Act No. 170 (H.955) — Act Summary View
  2. Vermont General Assembly. Act 170 As Enacted — Sec. 12. CESA Transition View
  3. Vermont Agency of Education. Education Transformation — Agency of Education View
  4. Seven Days. 'Do Not Slow Down' on Ed Reform, Gov Tells School Leaders View
  5. Waterbury Roundabout. Gov. Scott to education leaders: We must finish the job View
  6. VTDigger. Vermont's new education law pays districts to merge. It doesn't make them save. View
  7. Vermont Public. Did Act 46 work? It's complicated View
  8. Vermont General Assembly. Presentation by Grace Miller — Mergers Testimony to Senate Education Committee, January 23, 2026 View
  9. Vermont General Assembly. H.955 Fiscal Note as Recommended by Senate Finance, May 14, 2026 View
Vermont's Act 170 creates seven regional education service areas and merger committees with tight deadlines | School Decision