The top reported proficiency rate is 85% in Science. The lowest is 63% in Math.
Original Research by School Decision on Underwood
Underwood is an elementary school in Newton, Massachusetts, serving kindergarten through fifth grade. It is one of the regular elementary schools within the Newton Public Schools district, and as a K–5 building, it does not have a graduation rate or the kind of high-school-level program pathways that would be relevant to a middle or high school. Families considering Underwood are looking at a foundational academic experience that will feed into the district’s middle and high schools.
The school operates as a neighborhood-based public school in a city that is known not for a single downtown but for a collection of thirteen villages. Underwood sits on Vernon Street in a residential section of Newton. The city itself is a mature, largely built-out suburb with a strong institutional presence from Boston College and Newton-Wellesley Hospital, and it is connected to Boston by MBTA light rail, commuter rail, and buses. The housing market in the area carries a high price tag, reflecting the desirability of the city’s schools and its proximity to Boston. For a family looking at Underwood, this means the surrounding real estate is expensive, and competition for homes in its attendance zone is likely to be strong.
Academically, Underwood’s state test results for the most recent year show a majority of students meeting proficiency standards in both math and English language arts. In science, where state testing occurs only in fifth grade, the share of students reaching proficiency was notably high. When placed in the context of other districts in Middlesex County, the school’s overall proficiency across tested subjects and grades lands in the top quarter. That is a strong position. Looking at data over a longer span, the school has generally held math and ELA proficiency rates in the range of just under two-thirds to three-quarters of students in most recent pre-pandemic years, with some year-to-year fluctuation. A parent might take this as evidence of consistent, solid academic performance rather than a boom-or-bust pattern.
The school environment is that of a regular, non-charter public school. It does not operate as a magnet or Title I school. Information on free and reduced-price lunch eligibility was not available, making it hard to judge the level of economic diversity from that metric. The student body is racially and ethnically diverse, with the largest single group being white students, followed by Asian students, then Hispanic students, students identifying as two or more races, Black students, and a very small number of American Indian or Alaska Native students. Data on the share of students with disabilities (IEP) and English learners was not reported in the available data, so a parent with a child who may need those supports should ask the school directly about its services and staffing.
Because this is a K–5 school, the kind of academic offerings a family might look for at a larger school—AP courses, career and technical education, college-readiness programs—are not applicable. The focus is on building literacy and numeracy in the early grades, and Underwood’s assessment results suggest that the school is generally effective at that core task. The school participates in the state’s NextGen MCAS testing, and participation rates were reported at full participation, which means there is no concern about testing avoidance.
The broader district context is stable. The Newton Public Schools district brief did not surface any recent major changes—no boundary redraws, program overhauls, or leadership shifts that would be of immediate concern to a parent. That absence of drama is itself a piece of information: the system is not in a period of visible upheaval. Newton’s village-based geography means that most families develop a strong attachment to their specific elementary school, and Underwood’s performance and demographic profile put it squarely in the mainstream of that system’s high-performing elementary tier.
For a family weighing this school, the picture is one of a well-regarded elementary school in a desirable, expensive suburb, with consistent academic results that are strong relative to the county. The main open question for a prospective parent would be whether the school’s support services match their child’s needs, since those details are not captured in the available data. Otherwise, Underwood presents as a solid, conventional neighborhood public school with a track record of academic strength.
See more original research from School Decision →