Original Research by School Decision on St. Anthony Village Alternative
St. Anthony Village Alternative is a public alternative high school serving grades nine through twelve, part of the St. Anthony-New Brighton Schools district in the first-ring suburb of Saint Anthony Village, Minnesota. The school sits within a compact, centrally clustered civic area of this small city located a few miles northeast of downtown Minneapolis. Saint Anthony Village evolved from agricultural land to a postwar suburb and has seen notable redevelopment, including the replacement of the historic Apache Plaza with the Silver Lake Village shopping and residential complex. The city’s schools, including St. Anthony Village High School and the middle and elementary schools, are integrated into the same central neighborhood near Central Park and the community center. The district serves the village and neighboring New Brighton; the alternative school is one of the district’s specialized options.
As an alternative school, St. Anthony Village Alternative is designed for students who may need a nontraditional learning environment, often to recover credits, address behavioral or academic challenges, or complete high school in a setting with more individualized support. The school’s reported enrollment figures are listed as zero across all four grade levels, which is an unusual data point. This could indicate that the school had no enrolled students at the time of the data collection, or that numbers are suppressed due to small populations—a common practice for alternative programs to protect student privacy. A parent or guardian should confirm current enrollment directly with the school or district.
Because of the school’s specialized nature, many of the standard academic metrics that families typically rely on are absent. State assessment results are not available, and there is no reported four-year graduation rate, chronic absenteeism rate, or proficiency index. This lack of data does not necessarily reflect weak performance; alternative schools frequently fall outside conventional accountability frameworks. They may measure student progress through alternative benchmarks, such as credit attainment, postsecondary readiness, or reduced recidivism, rather than through standardized tests and traditional graduation timelines. The district’s own profile for the alternative program was not detailed in available sources, and no recent district-level changes—such as policy shifts, boundary adjustments, or facility investments—were identified in the research.
Demographic and program information is likewise sparse. Free or reduced-price meal eligibility, special education identification, English learner status, and race and ethnicity rates are all unreported. No course offerings, extracurricular programs, or staffing data are recorded in the data sections. The school’s website and the district’s alternative education coordinator would be the best sources for a current picture of class size, curriculum, support services, and student population.
The housing market in the surrounding ZIP code is roughly in line with state and national benchmarks, with typical home values and rents reflecting an established suburban area. The community itself is small and well-connected by highways to the Twin Cities, but it lacks a Walk Score or detailed transit information in the public record. For families considering this alternative school, the key takeaway is that this is a specialized program intended for students who benefit from a non-traditional high school path. Conventional metrics like test scores and graduation rates are not published, which is characteristic of many alternative settings. Anyone evaluating this option should reach out to the district to understand the program’s structure, enrollment criteria, and how it tracks student success. The absence of data in this profile is a prompt for inquiry, not a judgment about the school’s quality.
See more original research from School Decision →