Original Research by School Decision on Bloomfield School
Bloomfield School serves students from pre-kindergarten through eighth grade in the unincorporated rural hamlet of Bloomfield, Montana, a community with a population recorded in the single digits at the last census. The school is the sole educational facility in the Bloomfield Elem district, and its enrollment is very small, comprising a handful of students spread across the elementary and middle grades. The student body is predominantly white, with a small number of American Indian or Alaska Native students also represented. Data on economic disadvantage, special education, and English learner status are not available in the state reporting for this school.
Because the school’s tested population is so small, state assessment results in math, English language arts, and science are suppressed under Montana’s data privacy rules to protect individual student identities. The testing data that is reported shows that only a few students took the assessments, but the proficiency rates themselves are withheld. This means that the typical parent measure of school performance through standardized test scores is simply not available here, and it would not be reliable even if it were reported. The school does not serve high school grades, so there is no graduation rate to consider. In terms of academic pathway, Bloomfield School offers a single-classroom approach to instruction for its combined grades, with a very small teacher-to-student ratio that allows for individualized attention. However, no information on course offerings, advanced coursework, or specialized programs is available in the data.
The peer environment at Bloomfield School is shaped by the extreme smallness of the community. Students learn alongside the same small group of peers year after year, with little demographic diversity. The school is physically located on a rural route address, with no downtown or commercial district in Bloomfield itself. The nearest population center that offers civic amenities and a broader school choice is Glendive, roughly a half-hour drive to the south. The housing market in Bloomfield is not formally documented in the available sources; the area consists of scattered rural structures and agricultural land. There are no indications of new subdivisions or development projects. The community’s population has shown a very modest uptick in recent years, but the numbers remain negligible in absolute terms.
The school’s support infrastructure is minimal. No data on chronic absenteeism, discipline, or staffing beyond a single classroom teacher is reported. The district brief turned up no recent changes to curriculum, facilities, or funding that would be relevant to parents. The school operates as a remote, rural institution with a single teacher covering all subjects across multiple grade levels. For a family considering this school, the main factors are the extreme size, the isolation, and the lack of comparative data. A parent who values a very small, close-knit rural setting where their child would receive substantial one-on-one instruction might find it a natural fit. A parent who wants to see state test results, compare proficiency rates with other schools, or have access to specialized programs and extracurriculars will find that none of those are measurable here. The school sits outside the typical competitive frame that applies to larger districts; relative to the other nine districts in Dawson County, no proficiency or graduation comparison is possible because the school’s data is suppressed by its own size. This is a school that operates on a scale where the numbers themselves are too small to report, and that is the central fact of its identity.
See more original research from School Decision →