The reported proficiency rate for English language arts is 62%.
Original Research by School Decision on House Junior High
House Junior High sits in the village of House, a tiny incorporated community on the High Plains of eastern New Mexico, in Quay County, southwest of Tucumcari and northeast of Clovis, near the Texas border. The village has roughly five dozen residents and has experienced steady population decline over several decades, with only a slight uptick projected in the near term before another gentle dip. There is no separate downtown district; the school, the Village Hall, and the post office essentially form the civic footprint of the community. The setting is open high-plains ranchland near the Mescalero Escarpment on the western edge of the Llano Estacado, with no sidewalks, commercial corridors, or pedestrian infrastructure to speak of. The nearest identifiable major employer outside the school district itself is Cannon Air Force Base, roughly 38 miles away. Housing here ranks among the most affordable in New Mexico, and no major new residential or commercial development is documented.
The school serves grades six through eight and is a regular public school within the House Municipal School District, which classifies as Rural, Remote and operates three schools for a very small total student body across the district. House Junior High's own enrollment is small even for a rural junior high, with a handful of students per grade and a single eighth grader. The student body is roughly evenly split between Hispanic and White students, with a small number of Black students, and no students identified as American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or two or more races. A substantial majority of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch. Data on individualized education programs and English learner status was not available, so those populations cannot be characterized here.
Academic results are limited, and the reason is largely the size of the tested group. ELA proficiency is reported and sits at a level that suggests more than half of tested students met or exceeded proficiency. Math proficiency was suppressed, and science proficiency was suppressed as well, likely a function of the very small number of test-takers at this school rather than an indication of weak performance. No trend data across multiple years is available, so it is not possible to say whether results are improving, holding steady, or declining. Average scale scores were also missing. A parent looking for a fuller academic picture may want to ask the school directly about what the suppressed results look like and how the small cohorts affect reporting.
No data was available on course offerings, staffing ratios, attendance, discipline, or civil-rights indicators such as access or harassment reports. Program offerings were not listed. The district brief turned up no parent-relevant changes such as curriculum shifts, referendums, or property-tax adjustments in the recent period, which may simply reflect the stability and scale of a district this small.
What this school offers is a genuinely small, rural environment where a junior high student would be one of a very few classmates. That brings both intimacy and limitation. A child here will likely be known by every adult in the building, and peer groups will be small and tightly knit. At the same time, the breadth of electives, extracurriculars, and specialized services that larger schools can offer is unlikely to be available, and the data does not speak to what alternatives exist within or near the district. Families drawn to a remote, high-plains setting with very affordable housing and a close-knit school community may find this a fit. Families seeking richer program offerings or larger peer cohorts would need to look elsewhere or supplement outside school.
See more original research from School Decision →