The top reported proficiency rate is 52% in English language arts. The lowest is 8% in Science.
Original Research by School Decision on Christensen M J Es
Christensen M J Elementary sits on Mariner Cove Drive in Las Vegas, serving pre-kindergarten through fifth grade as part of the Clark County School District. It is a regular public school, neither a charter nor a magnet, and it draws from a surrounding neighborhood where home values run above the Nevada benchmark and well above the national one. Rents in the area are modest relative to many Las Vegas ZIP codes, and recent home values have softened slightly year over year. The local housing market carries a price-to-income ratio above the national norm, which speaks to the broader affordability picture many Clark County families face. Renting here costs meaningfully less per month than carrying a mortgage at current rates.
The school's enrollment is moderate for an elementary campus. Every student qualifies for free or reduced-price lunch, which places Christensen firmly in the category of schools serving a high-poverty community. The student body reflects Las Vegas's diversity: Hispanic students form the largest group, followed by White and Black students, with smaller shares of multiracial, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and American Indian or Alaska Native students.
On Nevada's state assessments, the most recent results tell a mixed story. In English language arts, a slim majority of tested students reached proficiency, which is a relative bright spot for a school with this demographic profile. Math results landed just below the halfway mark, with a respectable portion of students demonstrating grade-level command. Science proficiency, by contrast, was very low, with only a handful of tested students clearing the bar. Because science is assessed only in fifth grade at the elementary level, far fewer students sat for that exam. A parent may want to look into this further with the school, asking how science instruction is structured across the earlier grades and what supports are in place.
Participation rates across all three subjects were strong, which means the proficiency figures represent nearly the full tested population rather than a skewed subset. No multi-year trend data was available, so it is not possible to say whether these results reflect improvement, decline, or stability over time.
Several pieces of information parents might look for were absent from the available data. The school's Title I status was not reported, though the universal free-or-reduced-price lunch rate suggests the campus likely operates under a schoolwide model. Individualized education program data and English learner counts were missing, so the picture of special populations remains incomplete. Staffing ratios, disciplinary data, attendance figures, course access, and program offerings were also not available. Civil rights data was not provided. A locale brief for the surrounding community was not included, and the district brief search did not return parent-relevant policy or curriculum changes for Clark County School District.
What the available picture does convey is a neighborhood elementary school doing solid work in literacy, holding its own in math, and facing a clear challenge in science. The universal economic need among its families means the school is serving a community where resources and supports matter acutely. Families considering Christensen would benefit from asking the administration directly about science instruction, available interventions, enrichment programs, and how the school communicates academic progress to parents throughout the year. The data gaps here are wide enough that a conversation with the principal or a campus visit would fill in much of what the numbers alone cannot.
See more original research from School Decision →