Boiling Springs Middle, Inman SC

Original Research by School Decision on Boiling Springs Middle

Boiling Springs Middle is a regular public school serving grades six through eight in Inman, part of Spartanburg County School District 2. It sits within the Upstate region of South Carolina, a stretch of rolling foothills where small cities like Inman, historically known for textile mills and peach farming, are now growing steadily. The school draws from a mix of residential neighborhoods and the surrounding rural-commuter area.

On state assessments, the school’s English language arts results are a clear strength. Across all three tested grades, the share of students scoring at proficient or above sits comfortably above six in ten. This is a level that suggests most students leave Boiling Springs Middle with a solid foundation in reading, writing, and analysis. Math tells a different story. In every tested grade, the proficiency rate is below half, landing in the upper thirties to lower forties. That is a noticeable gap, and a parent moving through this school system may want to ask what math interventions or advanced course options are available. Science data is available only for sixth grade, and that cohort posted a result near the middle of the band. Social studies data comes from a single year many years ago and reflects a different assessment framework; it is too dated to carry much weight for today’s classroom.

When the school’s overall proficiency across subjects and grades is stacked against other districts within Spartanburg County, Boiling Springs Middle lands below the midpoint of that group. That is not a verdict; it is a reference point. A school can have strong ELA results and still place lower overall if math pulls the average down, which is the case here. Trend data exists for only one school year, so there is no way to tell whether scores are rising or falling.

Enrollment is substantial for a middle school of this grade band. The student body is predominantly white, with a meaningful share of Black students and smaller numbers of Hispanic, Asian, multiracial, and Native American students. A large majority of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, indicating that the school population includes many households with lower income. That economic context matters for understanding the resources a family might need to supplement, and it is worth asking how the school deploys its federal and state funding for academic support.

Inman itself is a compact city with a walkable historic downtown core, but the school sits on its own campus outside that downtown center, so students arrive by car or bus. The community has seen population growth in recent years, and a proposed rail trail—the Saluda Grade Trail—would begin in Inman’s downtown, potentially reshaping local recreation and economic activity. For now, the area remains car-oriented, with residents commuting to Spartanburg and other job centers. Housing values and rents in the zip code align closely with the state benchmark, and the area is not notably more or less affordable than the national average.

No recent district-level changes that would directly affect families were found in public sources, so parents should rely on the school’s own communications for updates on curriculum, scheduling, or facility plans. The school’s website would be the place to look for elective offerings, after-school activities, and support programs, as no program data is included in the available records.

Overall, Boiling Springs Middle delivers a strong English language arts experience for most students, while math performance calls for closer attention and a conversation with the school about what is being done. The student body is economically diverse, the school is large, and the district sits in a growing but still small-town part of the Upstate. A parent who values a solid middle school with clear ELA outcomes and a community that is changing but not yet crowded would find this a realistic option—with math as the topic to probe.

See more original research from School Decision →

Academic performance

How students perform on state tests, by grade, set against the district.

Math

Grade 643%

School 43% · District 44% · ▼ 1 pts below district

▲ 9 pts above state median · ▲ 2 pts above county median

Grade 738%

School 38% · District 36% · ▲ 2 pts above district

▲ 10 pts above state median · ▲ 1 pts above county median

Grade 844%

School 44% · District 42% · ▲ 2 pts above district

▲ 18 pts above state median · ▲ 6 pts above county median

English language arts

Grade 664%

School 64% · District 63% · ▲ 1 pts above district

▲ 11 pts above state median · ▲ 5 pts above county median

Grade 761%

School 61% · District 62% · ▼ 1 pts below district

▲ 6 pts above state median · even with county median

Grade 865%

School 65% · District 64% · ▲ 1 pts above district

▲ 11 pts above state median · ▲ 8 pts above county median

Science

Grade 655%

School 55% · District 55% · ▲ 1 pts above district

▲ 12 pts above state median · ▲ 6 pts above county median

Social studies

Grade 766%

School 66% · District 67% · ▼ 1 pts below district

▲ 2 pts above state median · even with county median

This schoolSpartanburg 02, same grade

Graduation rate (ACGR) reflects the federally published Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate for the most recent year available. We refresh this data annually at the close of each academic year in June. The federal source publishes a banded rate (for example, "90-94%") instead of an exact number for cohorts small enough to risk identifying individual students. The state distribution chart, where shown, plots every school in the state with a published rate or band; schools whose rate is federally suppressed are excluded. Where the federal source publishes a band rather than an exact rate, the school is placed within its band using a stable, ID-derived offset, so its position is consistent across visits.

Proficiency by household income

English language arts

Grade 6Lower-income57%Higher-income78%20 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income53%Higher-income77%24 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income59%Higher-income76%17 pp gap

Mathematics

Grade 6Lower-income37%Higher-income54%17 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income30%Higher-income51%21 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income39%Higher-income54%15 pp gap