Reading Jh, Richmond TX - Test Scores & Data

Original Research by School Decision on Reading Jh

Reading Junior High serves students in grades six through eight within Lamar Consolidated ISD in Richmond, a small county seat in Fort Bend County facing rapid suburban growth. The school enrolls roughly mid-sized numbers for its grade band, with a diverse student population: substantial shares of white, Hispanic, and Black students, alongside a notable Asian student contingent. About a third of the enrollment qualifies for free or reduced-price lunch, reflecting moderate economic diversity in the school's catchment area.

State assessment results show a profile with clear strengths in language arts but meaningful vulnerabilities in mathematics and social studies. In English Language Arts, sixth and seventh graders reach solid proficiency—performance across the school's ELA-tested grades is consistently strong, with the vast majority reaching proficient or above. Eighth-grade ELA results hold firm as well. Mathematics tells a different story. Sixth-grade math proficiency is respectable, and eighth-grade results are also solid, but seventh-grade math performance drops sharply, with only a modest share of seventh graders meeting the proficient standard. This dip warrants attention; parents may want to discuss with the school what instructional or support strategies are in place for that critical grade transition. Eighth-grade science proficiency reaches a majority, though not overwhelmingly so, and eighth-grade social studies is the school's clearest soft spot, with roughly half of students meeting proficiency. Overall, Reading JH's proficiency index sits above the midpoint relative to other districts in Fort Bend County, a meaningful distinction in a region with varied school performance.

The school is positioned in an area of substantial residential and commercial development. Richmond itself is anchored by a historic downtown core along Morton Street but increasingly defined by large master-planned communities such as Harvest Green and Candela, which bring new housing, families, and shopping infrastructure. Schools in this area tend to sit within or near these developments rather than in the historic downtown. Housing values in the Richmond zip code are moderate by Houston metro standards, with annual affordability metrics reflecting what many area families are willing to sustain. Fort Bend Transit provides curb-to-curb shared-ride service within the county and park-and-ride access to Houston employment centers.

Lamar CISD itself is navigating hypergrowth through an aggressive bond-backed building program. A large bond passed in 2022 and another approved in late 2025 are funding eight new campuses district-wide over the next few years, a dedicated career and technical education center opening fall 2026, and technology and facility upgrades. The district has held its property tax rate flat for three consecutive years while managing this expansion, one of the lowest rates in the Houston area. With ongoing enrollment growth—the district expects to add roughly thousands of students annually—rezoning is routine, and families should verify attendance boundaries via the district's address lookup tool if they move into the area.

Reading JH is an open-enrollment regular public school with no magnet or charter designation. The data provided does not include information about special education services, English learner support, discipline policies, course offerings, or staff composition, so a parent may want to contact the school directly to understand its approach to these areas. Academic trajectory and peer makeup make this a solid choice for families in the Richmond area prioritizing a mid-sized, diverse middle school with strong language arts instruction and awareness that mathematics support, particularly in seventh grade, may warrant direct conversation with school leadership.

See more original research from School Decision →

Academic performance

How students perform on state tests, by grade, set against the district.

Math

Grade 665%

School 65% · District 53% · ▲ 12 pts above district

▲ 31 pts above state median · ▲ 12 pts above county median

Grade 722%

School 22% · District 21% · ▲ 1 pts above district

▼ 5 pts below state median · ▼ 23 pts below county median

Grade 869%

School 69% · District 56% · ▲ 13 pts above district

▲ 27 pts above state median · ▲ 17 pts above county median

English language arts

Grade 676%

School 76% · District 69% · ▲ 7 pts above district

▲ 24 pts above state median · ▲ 4 pts above county median

Grade 779%

School 79% · District 62% · ▲ 17 pts above district

▲ 30 pts above state median · ▲ 9 pts above county median

Grade 879%

School 79% · District 64% · ▲ 15 pts above district

▲ 24 pts above state median · ▲ 7 pts above county median

Science

Grade 867%

School 67% · District 54% · ▲ 13 pts above district

▲ 25 pts above state median · ▲ 7 pts above county median

Social studies

Grade 856%

School 56% · District 38% · ▲ 18 pts above district

▲ 32 pts above state median · ▲ 14 pts above county median

This schoolLAMAR CISD, same grade

Graduation rate (ACGR) reflects the federally published Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate for the most recent year available. We refresh this data annually at the close of each academic year in June. The federal source publishes a banded rate (for example, "90-94%") instead of an exact number for cohorts small enough to risk identifying individual students. The state distribution chart, where shown, plots every school in the state with a published rate or band; schools whose rate is federally suppressed are excluded. Where the federal source publishes a band rather than an exact rate, the school is placed within its band using a stable, ID-derived offset, so its position is consistent across visits.

Proficiency by household income

English language arts

Grade 6Lower-income67%Higher-income80%13 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income58%Higher-income88%30 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income62%Higher-income86%24 pp gap

Mathematics

Grade 6Lower-income50%Higher-income72%22 pp gap

Grade 7Lower-income12%Higher-income31%19 pp gap

Grade 8Lower-income54%Higher-income75%21 pp gap